000838135 001__ 838135
000838135 005__ 20240712101000.0
000838135 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.5194/amt-10-3151-2017
000838135 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1867-1381
000838135 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1867-8548
000838135 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/15557
000838135 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000409039900002
000838135 037__ $$aFZJ-2017-06839
000838135 041__ $$aEnglish
000838135 082__ $$a550
000838135 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)2693$$aBohn, Birger$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000838135 245__ $$aCalibration and evaluation of CCD spectroradiometers for ground-based and airborne measurements of spectral actinic flux densities
000838135 260__ $$aKatlenburg-Lindau$$bCopernicus$$c2017
000838135 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000838135 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000838135 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1507530993_21555
000838135 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000838135 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000838135 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000838135 520__ $$aThe properties and performance of charge-coupled device (CCD) array spectroradiometers for the measurement of atmospheric spectral actinic flux densities (280–650 nm) and photolysis frequencies were investigated. These instruments are widely used in atmospheric research and are suitable for aircraft applications because of high time resolutions and high sensitivities in the UV range. The laboratory characterization included instrument-specific properties like the wavelength accuracy, dark signal, dark noise and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Spectral sensitivities were derived from measurements with spectral irradiance standards. The calibration procedure is described in detail, and a straightforward method to minimize the influence of stray light on spectral sensitivities is introduced. From instrument dark noise, minimum detection limits  ≈  1  ×  1010 cm−2 s−1 nm−1 were derived for spectral actinic flux densities at wavelengths around 300 nm (1 s integration time). As a prerequisite for the determination of stray light under field conditions, atmospheric cutoff wavelengths were defined using radiative transfer calculations as a function of the solar zenith angle (SZA) and total ozone column (TOC). The recommended analysis of field data relies on these cutoff wavelengths and is also described in detail taking data from a research flight on HALO (High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft) as an example. An evaluation of field data was performed by ground-based comparisons with a double-monochromator-based, highly sensitive reference spectroradiometer. Spectral actinic flux densities were compared as well as photolysis frequencies j(NO2) and j(O1D), representing UV-A and UV-B ranges, respectively. The spectra expectedly revealed increased daytime levels of stray-light-induced signals and noise below atmospheric cutoff wavelengths. The influence of instrument noise and stray-light-induced noise was found to be insignificant for j(NO2) and rather limited for j(O1D), resulting in estimated detection limits of 5  ×  10−7 and 1  ×  10−7 s−1, respectively, derived from nighttime measurements on the ground (0.3 s integration time, 10 s averages). For j(O1D) the detection limit could be further reduced by setting spectral actinic flux densities to zero below atmospheric cutoff wavelengths. The accuracies of photolysis frequencies were determined from linear regressions with data from the double-monochromator reference instrument. The agreement was typically within ±5 %. Because optical-receiver aspects are not specific for the CCD spectroradiometers, they were widely excluded in this work and will be treated in a separate paper, in particular with regard to airborne applications.
000838135 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-243$$a243 - Tropospheric trace substances and their transformation processes (POF3-243)$$cPOF3-243$$fPOF III$$x0
000838135 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000838135 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)136668$$aLohse, Insa$$b1$$ufzj
000838135 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2505596-3$$a10.5194/amt-10-3151-2017$$gVol. 10, no. 9, p. 3151 - 3174$$n9$$p3151 - 3174$$tAtmospheric measurement techniques$$v10$$x1867-8548$$y2017
000838135 8564_ $$uhttps://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3151-2017
000838135 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838135/files/amt-10-3151-2017.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000838135 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838135/files/amt-10-3151-2017.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yOpenAccess
000838135 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838135/files/amt-10-3151-2017.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yOpenAccess
000838135 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838135/files/amt-10-3151-2017.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yOpenAccess
000838135 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838135/files/amt-10-3151-2017.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yOpenAccess
000838135 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838135/files/amt-10-3151-2017.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000838135 8767_ $$8Helmholtz-PUC-2017-44$$92017-10-04$$d2017-10-04$$eAPC$$jZahlung erfolgt$$pamt-2017-74
000838135 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:838135$$pdnbdelivery$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire
000838135 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)2693$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000838135 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)136668$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000838135 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-243$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-240$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lAtmosphäre und Klima$$vTropospheric trace substances and their transformation processes$$x0
000838135 9141_ $$y2017
000838135 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
000838135 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000838135 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000838135 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bATMOS MEAS TECH : 2015
000838135 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000838135 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000838135 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000838135 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000838135 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000838135 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000838135 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000838135 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
000838135 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000838135 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000838135 920__ $$lyes
000838135 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013$$kIEK-8$$lTroposphäre$$x0
000838135 9801_ $$aAPC
000838135 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000838135 980__ $$ajournal
000838135 980__ $$aVDB
000838135 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000838135 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
000838135 980__ $$aAPC
000838135 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013