Home > Workflow collections > Publication Charges > The Future of Fossil Fired Power Plants in Germany—A Lifetime Analysis > print

001     845522
005     20240711101541.0
024 7 _ |a 10.3390/en11061616
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/19059
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000436552700294
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2018-02756
082 _ _ |a 620
100 1 _ |a Markewitz, Peter
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130471
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a The Future of Fossil Fired Power Plants in Germany—A Lifetime Analysis
260 _ _ |a Basel
|c 2018
|b MDPI
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1529646247_9484
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a In many German energy projections, the assumption of power plant lifetimes plays a central role, since it is often used in projections for the existing fleet of power plants or as a criterion for decommissioning in model-based investigations. The result of these analyses is a power plant capacity retirement graph, which is then used to determine the replacement demand. Especially in the context of the German Energy transition (“Energiewende”) the amount and dynamics of replacement play an important role. Against this background, a large number of studies have been evaluated and fleet developments compared. Many studies refer to empirical values for the assumption of lifetimes without specifying them in greater detail. This approach was used to conduct an ex post lifetime analysis—accurate to each number of units—of German power plants that have been decommissioned since 1990. The analysis is conducted with the aid of a power plant database, which has been continuously updated for each individual unit since 1985. In addition to the power plants currently in operation, the database includes also includes power plant units that have been successively decommissioned over the past decades. The ex post analysis presents the first lifetime analysis for decommissioned German plants, which can serve as a basis for future power plant fleet projections. The analyses show that the lifetime of fossil-fired power plants has extended considerably. For example, whereas the real lifetimes of coal-fired power plants were in a range of 30 to 35 years in the 1990s, today they amount to 40 to 45 years on average.
536 _ _ |a 134 - Electrolysis and Hydrogen (POF3-134)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134
|c POF3-134
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Robinius, Martin
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)156460
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Stolten, Detlef
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129928
|b 2
773 _ _ |a 10.3390/en11061616
|g Vol. 11, no. 6, p. 1616 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2437446-5
|n 6
|p 1616 -
|t Energies
|v 11
|y 2018
|x 1996-1073
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845522/files/Invoice_MDPI_energies-303604_1172.40EUR.pdf
856 4 _ |x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845522/files/Invoice_MDPI_energies-303604_1172.40EUR.gif?subformat=icon
856 4 _ |x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845522/files/Invoice_MDPI_energies-303604_1172.40EUR.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
856 4 _ |x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845522/files/Invoice_MDPI_energies-303604_1172.40EUR.jpg?subformat=icon-180
856 4 _ |x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845522/files/Invoice_MDPI_energies-303604_1172.40EUR.jpg?subformat=icon-640
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845522/files/energies-11-01616-v2.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845522/files/energies-11-01616-v2.gif?subformat=icon
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845522/files/energies-11-01616-v2.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845522/files/energies-11-01616-v2.jpg?subformat=icon-180
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845522/files/energies-11-01616-v2.jpg?subformat=icon-640
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:845522
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130471
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)156460
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129928
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Speicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-130
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Electrolysis and Hydrogen
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
914 1 _ |y 2018
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b ENERGIES : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
|k IEK-3
|l Elektrochemische Verfahrenstechnik
|x 0
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
980 _ _ |a APC
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-2-20101013

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21