% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Schultz:845584,
author = {Schultz, Martin G. and Stadtler, Scarlet and Schröder,
Sabine and Taraborrelli, Domenico and Franco, Bruno and
Krefting, Jonathan and Henrot, Alexandra and Ferrachat,
Sylvaine and Lohmann, Ulrike and Neubauer, David and
Siegenthaler-Le Drian, Colombe and Wahl, Sebastian and
Kokkola, Harri and Kühn, Thomas and Rast, Sebastian and
Schmidt, Hauke and Stier, Philip and Kinnison, Doug and
Tyndall, Geoffrey S. and Orlando, John J. and Wespes,
Catherine},
title = {{T}he chemistry–climate model
{ECHAM}6.3-{HAM}2.3-{MOZ}1.0},
journal = {Geoscientific model development},
volume = {11},
number = {5},
issn = {1991-9603},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
publisher = {Copernicus},
reportid = {FZJ-2018-02809},
pages = {1695 - 1723},
year = {2018},
abstract = {The chemistry–climate model ECHAM-HAMMOZ contains a
detailed representation of tropospheric and stratospheric
reactive chemistry and state-of-the-art parameterizations of
aerosols using either a modal scheme (M7) or a bin scheme
(SALSA). This article describes and evaluates the model
version ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0 with a focus on the
tropospheric gas-phase chemistry. A 10-year model simulation
was performed to test the stability of the model and provide
data for its evaluation. The comparison to observations
concentrates on the year 2008 and includes total column
observations of ozone and CO from IASI and OMI, Aura MLS
observations of temperature, HNO3, ClO, and O3 for the
evaluation of polar stratospheric processes, an ozonesonde
climatology, surface ozone observations from the TOAR
database, and surface CO data from the Global Atmosphere
Watch network. Global budgets of ozone, OH, NOx, aerosols,
clouds, and radiation are analyzed and compared to the
literature. ECHAM-HAMMOZ performs well in many aspects.
However, in the base simulation, lightning NOx emissions are
very low, and the impact of the heterogeneous reaction of
HNO3 on dust and sea salt aerosol is too strong. Sensitivity
simulations with increased lightning NOx or modified
heterogeneous chemistry deteriorate the comparison with
observations and yield excessively large ozone budget terms
and too much OH. We hypothesize that this is an impact of
potential issues with tropical convection in the ECHAM
model.},
cin = {IEK-8 / JSC / JARA-HPC},
ddc = {910},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013 / I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406 /
$I:(DE-82)080012_20140620$},
pnm = {243 - Tropospheric trace substances and their
transformation processes (POF3-243) / 512 - Data-Intensive
Science and Federated Computing (POF3-512) / Chemical
processes in the troposphere and their impact on climate
$(jicg23_20151101)$ / Earth System Data Exploration (ESDE)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-243 / G:(DE-HGF)POF3-512 /
$G:(DE-Juel1)jicg23_20151101$ / G:(DE-Juel-1)ESDE},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000431411600001},
doi = {10.5194/gmd-11-1695-2018},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845584},
}