000850627 001__ 850627
000850627 005__ 20240711101512.0
000850627 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.180
000850627 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0959-6526
000850627 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1879-1786
000850627 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000444358400041
000850627 037__ $$aFZJ-2018-04435
000850627 082__ $$a690
000850627 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)168163$$aWulf, Christina$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000850627 245__ $$aLife Cycle Assessment of hydrogen transport and distribution options
000850627 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2018
000850627 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000850627 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000850627 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1556801752_31545
000850627 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000850627 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000850627 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000850627 520__ $$aRenewably produced hydrogen offers a solution for mobility via fuel cell electric vehicles without emissions during driving. However, the hydrogen supply chain, from hydrogen production to the fueling station – incorporating seasonal storage and transport – varies in economic and environmental aspects depending on the technology used, as well as individual conditions, such as the distance between production and demand. Previous studies have focused on the economic aspects of varying technologies and elaborated application areas of each technology, while environmental issues were not specifically considered. To address this shortcoming, this paper presents a life cycle assessment of three supply chain architectures: (a) liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHCs hereinafter) for transport and storage; as well as (b) compressed hydrogen storage in salt caverns, together with pipelines; and (c) pressurized gas truck transport. The results of this study show that the pipeline solution has the least environmental impact with respect to most of the impact categories for all analyzed cases. Only for short distances, i.e., 100 km, is truck transport better in a few impact categories. When considering truck transport scenarios, LOHCs have higher environmental impacts than pressurized gas in seven out of 14 impact categories. Nevertheless, for longer distances, the difference is decreasing. The seasonal storage of hydrogen has almost no environmental influence, independent of the impact category, transport distance or hydrogen demand. In particular, strong scaling effects underlie the good performance of pipeline networks.
000850627 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153$$a153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)$$cPOF3-153$$fPOF III$$x0
000850627 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)ES2050$$aES2050 - Energie Sytem 2050 (ES2050)$$cES2050$$x1
000850627 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134$$a134 - Electrolysis and Hydrogen (POF3-134)$$cPOF3-134$$fPOF III$$x2
000850627 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000850627 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)168335$$aReuß, Markus$$b1
000850627 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129852$$aGrube, Thomas$$b2
000850627 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)130493$$aZapp, Petra$$b3
000850627 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)156460$$aRobinius, Martin$$b4
000850627 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129928$$aStolten, Detlef$$b5
000850627 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)130461$$aHake, Jürgen-Fr.$$b6$$ufzj
000850627 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2029338-0$$a10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.180$$gp. S095965261832170X$$p431-443$$tJournal of cleaner production$$v199$$x0959-6526$$y2018
000850627 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/1-s2.0-S095965261832170X-main.pdf$$yRestricted
000850627 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/W1462348.pdf
000850627 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/1-s2.0-S095965261832170X-main.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000850627 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/1-s2.0-S095965261832170X-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000850627 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/1-s2.0-S095965261832170X-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000850627 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/1-s2.0-S095965261832170X-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000850627 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/1-s2.0-S095965261832170X-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000850627 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/W1462348.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon
000850627 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/W1462348.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440
000850627 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/W1462348.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180
000850627 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/W1462348.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640
000850627 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/W1462348.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa
000850627 8767_ $$812258414$$92018-08-03$$d2018-08-03$$eColour charges$$jZahlung erfolgt$$p03052
000850627 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:850627$$popenCost$$pOpenAPC$$pVDB
000850627 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)168163$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000850627 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)168335$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000850627 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129852$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000850627 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)130493$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000850627 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)156460$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000850627 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129928$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
000850627 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)130461$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b6$$kFZJ
000850627 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bEnergie$$lTechnologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft$$vAssessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security$$x0
000850627 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-130$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bEnergie$$lSpeicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen$$vElectrolysis and Hydrogen$$x1
000850627 9141_ $$y2018
000850627 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000850627 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000850627 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ CLEAN PROD : 2015
000850627 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000850627 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000850627 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000850627 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000850627 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000850627 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000850627 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000850627 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
000850627 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000850627 920__ $$lyes
000850627 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013$$kIEK-STE$$lSystemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung$$x0
000850627 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013$$kIEK-3$$lElektrochemische Verfahrenstechnik$$x1
000850627 9801_ $$aAPC
000850627 980__ $$ajournal
000850627 980__ $$aVDB
000850627 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
000850627 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
000850627 980__ $$aAPC
000850627 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000850627 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-2-20101013