Home > Workflow collections > Publication Charges > Life Cycle Assessment of hydrogen transport and distribution options > print

001     850627
005     20240711101512.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.180
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0959-6526
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1879-1786
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000444358400041
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2018-04435
082 _ _ |a 690
100 1 _ |a Wulf, Christina
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)168163
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Life Cycle Assessment of hydrogen transport and distribution options
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2018
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1556801752_31545
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Renewably produced hydrogen offers a solution for mobility via fuel cell electric vehicles without emissions during driving. However, the hydrogen supply chain, from hydrogen production to the fueling station – incorporating seasonal storage and transport – varies in economic and environmental aspects depending on the technology used, as well as individual conditions, such as the distance between production and demand. Previous studies have focused on the economic aspects of varying technologies and elaborated application areas of each technology, while environmental issues were not specifically considered. To address this shortcoming, this paper presents a life cycle assessment of three supply chain architectures: (a) liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHCs hereinafter) for transport and storage; as well as (b) compressed hydrogen storage in salt caverns, together with pipelines; and (c) pressurized gas truck transport. The results of this study show that the pipeline solution has the least environmental impact with respect to most of the impact categories for all analyzed cases. Only for short distances, i.e., 100 km, is truck transport better in a few impact categories. When considering truck transport scenarios, LOHCs have higher environmental impacts than pressurized gas in seven out of 14 impact categories. Nevertheless, for longer distances, the difference is decreasing. The seasonal storage of hydrogen has almost no environmental influence, independent of the impact category, transport distance or hydrogen demand. In particular, strong scaling effects underlie the good performance of pipeline networks.
536 _ _ |a 153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|c POF3-153
|f POF III
|x 0
536 _ _ |a ES2050 - Energie Sytem 2050 (ES2050)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)ES2050
|c ES2050
|x 1
536 _ _ |a 134 - Electrolysis and Hydrogen (POF3-134)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134
|c POF3-134
|f POF III
|x 2
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Reuß, Markus
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)168335
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Grube, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129852
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Zapp, Petra
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130493
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Robinius, Martin
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)156460
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Stolten, Detlef
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129928
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Hake, Jürgen-Fr.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130461
|b 6
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.180
|g p. S095965261832170X
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2029338-0
|p 431-443
|t Journal of cleaner production
|v 199
|y 2018
|x 0959-6526
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/1-s2.0-S095965261832170X-main.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/W1462348.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/1-s2.0-S095965261832170X-main.gif?subformat=icon
|x icon
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/1-s2.0-S095965261832170X-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/1-s2.0-S095965261832170X-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/1-s2.0-S095965261832170X-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/1-s2.0-S095965261832170X-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/W1462348.gif?subformat=icon
|x icon
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/W1462348.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/W1462348.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/W1462348.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850627/files/W1462348.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:850627
|p VDB
|p OpenAPC
|p openCost
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)168163
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)168335
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129852
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130493
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)156460
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129928
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130461
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Technologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Speicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-130
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Electrolysis and Hydrogen
|x 1
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
914 1 _ |y 2018
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J CLEAN PROD : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
|k IEK-STE
|l Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
|k IEK-3
|l Elektrochemische Verfahrenstechnik
|x 1
980 1 _ |a APC
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
980 _ _ |a APC
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-2-20101013

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21