% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Adrian:852668,
      author       = {Adrian, Juliane and Langenbach, Hannah and Tezkan, Bülent
                      and Gurk, Marcus and Novruzov, Ali G. and Mammadov, Avez L.},
      title        = {{E}xploration of the {N}ear-surface {S}tructure of {M}ud
                      {V}olcanoes using {E}lectromagnetic {T}echniques: {A} {C}ase
                      {S}tudy from {P}erekishkul, {A}zerbaijan},
      journal      = {Journal of environmental $\&$ engineering geophysics},
      volume       = {20},
      number       = {2},
      issn         = {1083-1363},
      address      = {Alxandria, Va.},
      publisher    = {GeoScienceWorld},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-05541},
      pages        = {153 - 164},
      year         = {2015},
      abstract     = {The general aim of this study is, for the first time, to
                      investigate the inner structure of mudvolcanoes in
                      Azerbaijan using several near-surface electromagnetic
                      methods. The central-looptransient electromagnetic (TEM)
                      method and the radiomagnetotelluric (RMT) method wereapplied
                      on mud volcanoes near Perekishkul, Azerbaijan. These methods
                      complement each otherin terms of depth of investigation. In
                      particular, the RMT method generally resolves the
                      veryshallow resistivity structures (,10 m) directly beneath
                      the mud volcanoes, whereas the TEMmethod provides a
                      resolution of up to 100- to 150-m depth.The obtained data
                      sets were processed and interpreted individually. The TEM
                      data wereinterpreted by conventional 1-D inversion
                      algorithms, i.e., Occam’s and Marquardt inversion,and by a
                      quasi-2-D laterally constrained inversion. The RMT data were
                      interpreted by 2-Dinversion. Subsequently, a combined model
                      regarding the sediments and correspondingresistivities for
                      the area around the mud volcanoes was derived.Overall, a
                      resistivity range of 1–20 V-m was observed. The
                      resistivity models obtainedfrom TEM support the assumption
                      of a three-layer subsurface for the resolved depth
                      range.Also, a lateral resistivity variation caused by the
                      mud volcanoes was observed. Furthermore, theRMT results
                      indicate the presence of shallow low resistivity structures,
                      which can be interpretedas mud reservoirs.},
      ddc          = {550},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      doi          = {10.2113/JEEG20.2.153},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852668},
}