% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Haroon:852669,
author = {Haroon, A. and Adrian, J. and Bergers, R. and Gurk, M. and
Tezkan, B. and Mammadov, A. L. and Novruzov, A. G.},
title = {{J}oint inversion of long-offset and central-loop transient
electromagnetic data: {A}pplication to a mud volcano
exploration in {P}erekishkul, {A}zerbaijan},
journal = {Geophysical prospecting},
volume = {63},
number = {2},
issn = {0016-8025},
address = {Oxford [u.a.]},
publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
reportid = {FZJ-2018-05542},
pages = {478 - 494},
year = {2015},
abstract = {Mud volcanism is commonly observed in Azerbaijan and the
surrounding SouthCaspian Basin. This natural phenomenon is
very similar to magmatic volcanoes butdiffers in one
considerable aspect: Magmatic volcanoes are generally the
result ofascending molten rock within the Earth’s crust,
whereas mud volcanoes are characterisedby expelling mixtures
of water, mud, and gas. The majority of mud volcanoeshave
been observed on ocean floors or in deep sedimentary basins,
such as those foundin Azerbaijan. Furthermore, their
occurrences in Azerbaijan are generally closely
associatedwith hydrocarbon reservoirs and are therefore of
immense economic andgeological interest. The broadside
long-offset transient electromagnetic method andthe
central-loop transient electromagnetic method were applied
to study the innerstructure of such mud volcanoes and to
determine the depth of a resistive geologicalformation that
is predicted to contain the majority of the hydrocarbon
reservoirsin the survey area. One-dimensional joint
inversion of central-loop and long-offsettransient
electromagnetic data was performed using the inversion
schemes of Occamand Marquardt. By using the joint inversion
models, a subsurface resistivity structureranging from the
surface to a depth of approximately 7 km was
determined.Along a profile running perpendicular to the
assumed strike direction, lateral resistivityvariations
could only be determined in the shallow depth range using
thetransient electromagnetic data. An attempt to resolve
further two-dimensional/threedimensionalresistivity
structures, representing possible mud migration paths at
largedepths using the long-offset transient electromagnetic
data, failed. Moreover, thejoint inversion models led to
ambiguous results regarding the depth and resistivity ofthe
hydrocarbon target formation due to poor resolution at great
depths (>5 km).Thus, 1D/2D modelling studies were
subsequently performed to investigate the influenceof the
resistive terminating half-space on the measured long-offset
transientelectromagnetic data.The 1D joint inversion models
were utilised as starting models for both the 1D and2D
modelling studies. The results tend to show that a resistive
terminating half-space,implying the presence of the target
formation, is the favourable geological setting.Furthermore,
the 2D modelling study aimed to fit all measured long-offset
transientelectromagnetic Ex transients along the profile
simultaneously. Consequently, 31252D forward calculations
were necessary to determine the best-fit resistivity
model.The results are consistent with the 1D inversion,
indicating that the data are bestdescribed by a resistive
terminating half-space, although the resistivity and
depthcannot be determined clearly.},
ddc = {550},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
doi = {10.1111/1365-2478.12157},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852669},
}