% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Zohm:860633,
author = {Zohm, H. and Träuble, F. and Biel, W. and Fable, E. and
Kemp, R. and Lux, H. and Siccinio, M. and Wenninger, R.},
title = {{A} stepladder approach to a tokamak fusion power plant},
journal = {Nuclear fusion},
volume = {57},
number = {8},
issn = {1741-4326},
address = {Vienna},
publisher = {IAEA},
reportid = {FZJ-2019-01306},
pages = {086002 -},
year = {2017},
abstract = {We present an approach to design in a consistent way a
stepladder connecting ITER, DEMO and an FPP, starting from
an attractive FPP and then locating DEMO such that main
similarity parameters for the core scenario are constant.
The approach presented suggests how to use ITER such that
DEMO can be extrapolated with maximum confidence and a
development path for plasma scenarios in ITER follows from
our approach, moving from low β N and q typical for the
present Q = 10 scenario to higher values needed
for steady state. A numerical example is given, indicative
of the feasibility of the approach, and it is backed up by
more detailed 1.5-D calculation using the ASTRA code. We
note that ideal MHD stability analysis of the DEMO operating
point indicates that it is located between the no-wall and
the ideal wall β-limit, which may require active
stabilization. The DEMO design could also be a pulsed
fallback solution should a stationary operation turn out to
be impossible.},
cin = {IEK-4},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013},
pnm = {174 - Plasma-Wall-Interaction (POF3-174)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-174},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000403340600001},
doi = {10.1088/1741-4326/aa739e},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/860633},
}