000862367 001__ 862367
000862367 005__ 20210130001319.0
000862367 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s40685-017-0044-0
000862367 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1866-8658
000862367 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a2198-2627
000862367 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a2198-3402
000862367 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/22077
000862367 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:27980953
000862367 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-02701
000862367 041__ $$aEnglish
000862367 082__ $$a650
000862367 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aClermont, Marcel$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000862367 245__ $$aCitation metrics as an additional indicator for evaluating research performance? An analysis of their correlations and validity
000862367 260__ $$aHeidelberg$$bSpringer$$c2017
000862367 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000862367 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000862367 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1555480898_3909
000862367 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000862367 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000862367 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000862367 520__ $$aThis paper investigates the potential expansion of an indicator set for research performance evaluation to include citations for the mapping of research impact. To this end, we use research performance data of German business schools and consider the linear correlations and the rank correlations between publication-based, supportive, and citation-based indicators. Furthermore, we compare the business schools in partial ratings of the relative indicators amongst themselves and with those business schools that are classified in other studies as being strong in research and/or reputable. Only low correlations are found between the citation metrics and the other indicator types. Since citations map research outcome, this is an expected result in terms of divergent validity. Amongst themselves, the citation metrics display high correlations, which, in accordance with the convergent validity, shows that they can represent research outcome. However, this does not apply to the J-factor, which is a journal-based normalizing citation metric.
000862367 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899$$a899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)$$cPOF3-899$$fPOF III$$x0
000862367 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000862367 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDirksen, Alexander$$b1
000862367 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)142057$$aScheidt, Barbara$$b2$$ufzj
000862367 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)133831$$aTunger, Dirk$$b3$$ufzj
000862367 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2426376-X$$a10.1007/s40685-017-0044-0$$gVol. 10, no. 2, p. 249 - 279$$n2$$p249 - 279$$tBusiness research$$v10$$x2198-2627$$y2017
000862367 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862367/files/Clermont2017_Article_CitationMetricsAsAnAdditionalI.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000862367 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862367/files/Clermont2017_Article_CitationMetricsAsAnAdditionalI.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000862367 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:862367$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000862367 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)142057$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000862367 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)133831$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000862367 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bProgrammungebundene Forschung$$lohne Programm$$vohne Topic$$x0
000862367 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000862367 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000862367 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000862367 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000862367 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Double blind peer review
000862367 920__ $$lyes
000862367 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)ZB-20090406$$kZB$$lZentralbibliothek$$x0
000862367 980__ $$ajournal
000862367 980__ $$aVDB
000862367 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000862367 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ZB-20090406
000862367 9801_ $$aFullTexts