Journal Article FZJ-2019-02701

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Citation metrics as an additional indicator for evaluating research performance? An analysis of their correlations and validity

 ;  ;  ;

2017
Springer Heidelberg

Business research 10(2), 249 - 279 () [10.1007/s40685-017-0044-0]

This record in other databases:  

Please use a persistent id in citations:   doi:

Abstract: This paper investigates the potential expansion of an indicator set for research performance evaluation to include citations for the mapping of research impact. To this end, we use research performance data of German business schools and consider the linear correlations and the rank correlations between publication-based, supportive, and citation-based indicators. Furthermore, we compare the business schools in partial ratings of the relative indicators amongst themselves and with those business schools that are classified in other studies as being strong in research and/or reputable. Only low correlations are found between the citation metrics and the other indicator types. Since citations map research outcome, this is an expected result in terms of divergent validity. Amongst themselves, the citation metrics display high correlations, which, in accordance with the convergent validity, shows that they can represent research outcome. However, this does not apply to the J-factor, which is a journal-based normalizing citation metric.

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Zentralbibliothek (ZB)
Research Program(s):
  1. 899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899) (POF3-899)

Database coverage:
Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 ; DOAJ ; OpenAccess ; DOAJ Seal
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Workflow collections > Public records
Institute Collections > ZB
Publications database
Open Access

 Record created 2019-04-15, last modified 2021-01-30