% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Clermont:862367,
author = {Clermont, Marcel and Dirksen, Alexander and Scheidt,
Barbara and Tunger, Dirk},
title = {{C}itation metrics as an additional indicator for
evaluating research performance? {A}n analysis of their
correlations and validity},
journal = {Business research},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
issn = {2198-2627},
address = {Heidelberg},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {FZJ-2019-02701},
pages = {249 - 279},
year = {2017},
abstract = {This paper investigates the potential expansion of an
indicator set for research performance evaluation to include
citations for the mapping of research impact. To this end,
we use research performance data of German business schools
and consider the linear correlations and the rank
correlations between publication-based, supportive, and
citation-based indicators. Furthermore, we compare the
business schools in partial ratings of the relative
indicators amongst themselves and with those business
schools that are classified in other studies as being strong
in research and/or reputable. Only low correlations are
found between the citation metrics and the other indicator
types. Since citations map research outcome, this is an
expected result in terms of divergent validity. Amongst
themselves, the citation metrics display high correlations,
which, in accordance with the convergent validity, shows
that they can represent research outcome. However, this does
not apply to the J-factor, which is a journal-based
normalizing citation metric.},
cin = {ZB},
ddc = {650},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)ZB-20090406},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
doi = {10.1007/s40685-017-0044-0},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862367},
}