Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Citation metrics as an additional indicator for evaluating research performance? An analysis of their correlations and validity > print

001     862367
005     20210130001319.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1007/s40685-017-0044-0
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1866-8658
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2198-2627
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2198-3402
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/22077
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:27980953
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2019-02701
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 650
100 1 _ |a Clermont, Marcel
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Citation metrics as an additional indicator for evaluating research performance? An analysis of their correlations and validity
260 _ _ |a Heidelberg
|c 2017
|b Springer
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1555480898_3909
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a This paper investigates the potential expansion of an indicator set for research performance evaluation to include citations for the mapping of research impact. To this end, we use research performance data of German business schools and consider the linear correlations and the rank correlations between publication-based, supportive, and citation-based indicators. Furthermore, we compare the business schools in partial ratings of the relative indicators amongst themselves and with those business schools that are classified in other studies as being strong in research and/or reputable. Only low correlations are found between the citation metrics and the other indicator types. Since citations map research outcome, this is an expected result in terms of divergent validity. Amongst themselves, the citation metrics display high correlations, which, in accordance with the convergent validity, shows that they can represent research outcome. However, this does not apply to the J-factor, which is a journal-based normalizing citation metric.
536 _ _ |a 899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899
|c POF3-899
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Dirksen, Alexander
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Scheidt, Barbara
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)142057
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Tunger, Dirk
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)133831
|b 3
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1007/s40685-017-0044-0
|g Vol. 10, no. 2, p. 249 - 279
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2426376-X
|n 2
|p 249 - 279
|t Business research
|v 10
|y 2017
|x 2198-2627
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862367/files/Clermont2017_Article_CitationMetricsAsAnAdditionalI.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862367/files/Clermont2017_Article_CitationMetricsAsAnAdditionalI.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:862367
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)142057
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)133831
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800
|v ohne Topic
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Double blind peer review
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)ZB-20090406
|k ZB
|l Zentralbibliothek
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ZB-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21