% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Ehteshami:863369,
      author       = {Ehteshami, Niloofar and Eguia-Barrio, Aitor and de Meatza,
                      Iratxe and Porcher, Willy and Paillard, Elie},
      title        = {{A}diponitrile-based electrolytes for high voltage,
                      graphite-based {L}i-ion battery},
      journal      = {Journal of power sources},
      volume       = {397},
      issn         = {0378-7753},
      address      = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-03442},
      pages        = {52 - 58},
      year         = {2018},
      abstract     = {Operating high voltage lithium-ion batteries (LIB) is still
                      an obstacle due to the limited anodic stability of
                      state-of-the-art alkyl carbonates-based electrolytes which
                      incorporate ethylene carbonate (EC). Thus, we replace here
                      the widely used ethylene carbonate (EC)/dimethyl carbonate
                      (DMC) solvent formulation by adiponitrile (ADN)/DMC (1/1,
                      wt./wt.), to enable room temperature electrolyte
                      formulations with high anodic stabilities. The possibility
                      of operating graphite with 1 M LiDFOB $\&$ 1 M LiFSI
                      ADN/DMC (1/1, wt./wt.) without additive is evidenced, with a
                      clear advantage for the LiDFOB electrolyte. The addition of
                      fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) as a SEI additive results in
                      improved graphite electrode performance in both cases and,
                      less expectedly, in improved anodic stabilities. Cathodes
                      operating above 4.3 V vs Li+/Li have been paired with
                      graphite as well and allowed improved rate capability as
                      compared to graphite half-cells. The safety of the
                      electrolytes versus a charged graphite anode is improved as
                      compared with state-of-the-art, EC-based electrolytes.},
      cin          = {IEK-12},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-12-20141217},
      pnm          = {131 - Electrochemical Storage (POF3-131)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000445317900008},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.004},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/863369},
}