000863422 001__ 863422
000863422 005__ 20240711101515.0
000863422 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0013-4651
000863422 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0096-4743
000863422 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0096-4786
000863422 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1945-6859
000863422 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1945-7111
000863422 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a2002-2015
000863422 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a2156-7395
000863422 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/en12122370
000863422 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/22520
000863422 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000473821400143
000863422 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-03492
000863422 082__ $$a620
000863422 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)171458$$aShi, Yan$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000863422 245__ $$aA Transient Behavior Study of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells with Cyclic Current Profiles
000863422 260__ $$aBasel$$bMDPI$$c2019
000863422 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000863422 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000863422 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1563816225_18485
000863422 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000863422 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000863422 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000863422 520__ $$aThis paper reports on the effects of different load profiles on the transient behavior of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC). A protocol of six tests, each with different current density ramps, was conducted. The corresponding cell voltage, pressure drop response, and ohmic resistance were then experimentally investigated. The time-dependent voltage profiles were applied to represent the cell performance. The cathodic pressure drop and ohmic resistance were utilized to analyze the water dynamic behavior inside the cell. The voltage overshoot and undershoot behavior were observed throughout the experiment. It was found that with an increase of the current change rates, the magnitude of voltage over/undershoots also increased. When the holding time at the constant current density was zero, the overshoot or undershoot behavior disappeared. The results of the pressure drop analysis showed that the load ramp did not have a significant effect on the average pressure drop in the tests. During the load cyclic operation in each test, the two-phase flow tended to reach equilibrium in the cell. Impedance analysis showed that the ohmic resistance changed with the change in the current density; however, the difference between the tests was not obvious
000863422 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135$$a135 - Fuel Cells (POF3-135)$$cPOF3-135$$fPOF III$$x0
000863422 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000863422 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129863$$aJanßen, Holger$$b1$$ufzj
000863422 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129883$$aLehnert, Werner$$b2
000863422 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2437446-5$$a10.3390/en12122370$$gVol. 153, no. 3, p. A570 -$$n12$$p2370 -$$tEnergies$$v12$$x1996-1073$$y2019
000863422 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/863422/files/Invoice_MDPI_energies-521804_1365.71EUR.pdf
000863422 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/863422/files/Invoice_MDPI_energies-521804_1365.71EUR.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa
000863422 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/863422/files/energies-12-02370.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000863422 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/863422/files/energies-12-02370.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000863422 8767_ $$8energies-521804$$92019-06-19$$d2019-06-19$$eAPC$$jZahlung erfolgt$$zFZJ-2019-03196
000863422 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:863422$$pdnbdelivery$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire
000863422 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)171458$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000863422 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129863$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000863422 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129883$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000863422 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-130$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bEnergie$$lSpeicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen$$vFuel Cells$$x0
000863422 9141_ $$y2019
000863422 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000863422 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
000863422 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000863422 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000863422 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bENERGIES : 2017
000863422 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000863422 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000863422 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000863422 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000863422 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000863422 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000863422 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000863422 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000863422 920__ $$lyes
000863422 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013$$kIEK-3$$lElektrochemische Verfahrenstechnik$$x0
000863422 9801_ $$aAPC
000863422 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000863422 980__ $$ajournal
000863422 980__ $$aVDB
000863422 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000863422 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
000863422 980__ $$aAPC
000863422 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-2-20101013