001     863422
005     20240711101515.0
024 7 _ |a 0013-4651
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0096-4743
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0096-4786
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1945-6859
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1945-7111
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2002-2015
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2156-7395
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 10.3390/en12122370
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/22520
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000473821400143
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2019-03492
082 _ _ |a 620
100 1 _ |a Shi, Yan
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)171458
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a A Transient Behavior Study of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells with Cyclic Current Profiles
260 _ _ |a Basel
|c 2019
|b MDPI
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1563816225_18485
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a This paper reports on the effects of different load profiles on the transient behavior of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC). A protocol of six tests, each with different current density ramps, was conducted. The corresponding cell voltage, pressure drop response, and ohmic resistance were then experimentally investigated. The time-dependent voltage profiles were applied to represent the cell performance. The cathodic pressure drop and ohmic resistance were utilized to analyze the water dynamic behavior inside the cell. The voltage overshoot and undershoot behavior were observed throughout the experiment. It was found that with an increase of the current change rates, the magnitude of voltage over/undershoots also increased. When the holding time at the constant current density was zero, the overshoot or undershoot behavior disappeared. The results of the pressure drop analysis showed that the load ramp did not have a significant effect on the average pressure drop in the tests. During the load cyclic operation in each test, the two-phase flow tended to reach equilibrium in the cell. Impedance analysis showed that the ohmic resistance changed with the change in the current density; however, the difference between the tests was not obvious
536 _ _ |a 135 - Fuel Cells (POF3-135)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135
|c POF3-135
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Janßen, Holger
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129863
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Lehnert, Werner
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129883
|b 2
773 _ _ |a 10.3390/en12122370
|g Vol. 153, no. 3, p. A570 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2437446-5
|n 12
|p 2370 -
|t Energies
|v 12
|y 2019
|x 1996-1073
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/863422/files/Invoice_MDPI_energies-521804_1365.71EUR.pdf
856 4 _ |x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/863422/files/Invoice_MDPI_energies-521804_1365.71EUR.pdf?subformat=pdfa
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/863422/files/energies-12-02370.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/863422/files/energies-12-02370.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:863422
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)171458
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129863
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129883
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Speicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-130
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Fuel Cells
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b ENERGIES : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
|k IEK-3
|l Elektrochemische Verfahrenstechnik
|x 0
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
980 _ _ |a APC
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-2-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21