% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Gomes:863429,
author = {Gomes, J. and Brüggemann, N. and Dick, D. P. and Pedroso,
G. M. and Veloso, M. and Bayer, C.},
title = {{U}rea and legume residues as 15{N}-{N}2{O} sources in a
subtropical soil},
journal = {Soil research},
volume = {57},
number = {3},
issn = {1838-675X},
address = {Collingwood, Victoria},
publisher = {CSIRO},
reportid = {FZJ-2019-03494},
pages = {287 - 293},
year = {2019},
abstract = {In this work, we used the 15N labelling technique to
identify the sources of N2O emitted by a subtropical soil
following application of mineral nitrogen (N) fertiliser
(urea) and residues of a legume cover crop (cowpea). For
this purpose, a 45-day incubation experiment was conducted
by subjecting undisturbed soil cores from a subtropical
Acrisol to five different treatments: (1) control (no crop
residue or fertiliser-N application); (2) 15N-labelled
cowpea residue (200 μg N g–1 soil); (3) 15N-labelled urea
(200 μg N g–1 soil); (4) 15N-labelled cowpea residue (100
μg N g–1 soil) + unlabelled urea (100 μg N g–1 soil);
and (5) unlabelled cowpea residue (100 μg N g–1 soil) +
15N-labelled urea (100 μg N g–1 soil). Cores were
analysed for total N2O formation, δ15N-N2O and δ18O-N2O by
continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry, as well as
for total NO3–-N and NH4+-N. Legume crop residues and
mineral fertiliser increased N2O emissions from soil to 10.5
and 9.7 µg N2O-N cm–2 respectively, which was roughly six
times the value for control (1.5 µg N2O-N cm–2). The
amount of 15N2O emitted from labelled 15N-urea
$(0.40–0.45\%$ of 15N applied) was greater than from
15N-cowpea residues $(0.013–0.015\%$ of 15N applied).
Unlike N-poor crop residues, urea in combination with N-rich
residues (cowpea) failed to reduce N2O emissions relative to
urea alone. Legume cover crops thus provide an effective
mitigation strategy for N2O emissions in relation to mineral
N fertilisation in climate-smart agriculture. Judging by our
inconclusive results, however, using urea in combination
with N-rich residues provides no clear-cut environmental
advantage.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {640},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000463909500009},
doi = {10.1071/SR18300},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/863429},
}