% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Tao:863606,
author = {Tao, Mengchu and Konopka, Paul and Ploeger, Felix and Yan,
Xiaolu and Wright, Jonathon S. and Diallo, Mohamadou and
Fueglistaler, Stephan and Riese, Martin},
title = {{M}ultitimescale variations in modeled stratospheric water
vapor derived from three modern reanalysis products},
journal = {Atmospheric chemistry and physics},
volume = {19},
number = {9},
issn = {1680-7324},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
publisher = {EGU},
reportid = {FZJ-2019-03618},
pages = {6509 - 6534},
year = {2019},
abstract = {Stratospheric water vapor (SWV) plays important roles in
the radiation budget and ozone chemistry and is a valuable
tracer for understanding stratospheric transport.
Meteorological reanalyses provide variables necessary for
simulating this transport; however, even recent reanalyses
are subject to substantial uncertainties, especially in the
stratosphere. It is therefore necessary to evaluate the
consistency among SWV distributions simulated using
different input reanalysis products. In this study, we
evaluate the representation of SWV and its variations on
multiple timescales using simulations over the period
1980–2013. Our simulations are based on the Chemical
Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS) driven by
horizontal winds and diabatic heating rates from three
recent reanalyses: ERA-Interim, JRA-55 and MERRA-2. We
present an intercomparison among these model results and
observationally based estimates using a multiple linear
regression method to study the annual cycle (AC), the
quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO), and longer-term
variability in monthly zonal-mean H2O mixing ratios forced
by variations in the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO)
and the volcanic aerosol burden. We find reasonable
consistency among simulations of the distribution and
variability in SWV with respect to the AC and QBO. However,
the amplitudes of both signals are systematically weaker in
the lower and middle stratosphere when CLaMS is driven by
MERRA-2 than when it is driven by ERA-Interim or JRA-55.
This difference is primarily attributable to relatively slow
tropical upwelling in the lower stratosphere in simulations
based on MERRA-2. Two possible contributors to the slow
tropical upwelling in the lower stratosphere are suggested
to be the large long-wave cloud radiative effect and the
unique assimilation process in MERRA-2. The impacts of ENSO
and volcanic aerosol on H2O entry variability are
qualitatively consistent among the three simulations despite
differences of $50 \%–100 \%$ in the magnitudes.
Trends show larger discrepancies among the three
simulations. CLaMS driven by ERA-Interim produces a neutral
to slightly positive trend in H2O entry values over
1980–2013 (+0.01 ppmv decade$^{−1}$), while both
CLaMS driven by JRA-55 and CLaMS driven by MERRA-2 produce
negative trends but with significantly different magnitudes
(−0.22 and −0.08 ppmv decade$^{−1}$,
respectively).},
cin = {IEK-7},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013},
pnm = {244 - Composition and dynamics of the upper troposphere and
middle atmosphere (POF3-244)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-244},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000468193700006},
doi = {10.5194/acp-19-6509-2019},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/863606},
}