Home > Workflow collections > Publication Charges > Reforming of Diesel and Jet Fuel for Fuel Celles on a Systems Level: Steady-State and Transient Operation > print

001     875365
005     20241127124644.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115882
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/26172
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:91453651
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a WOS:000594115100005
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-01983
082 _ _ |a 620
100 1 _ |a Samsun, Remzi Can
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)207065
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Reforming of Diesel and Jet Fuel for Fuel Celles on a Systems Level: Steady-State and Transient Operation
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2020
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1605793697_21447
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The operation of fuel cell systems using liquid fuels widens the application possibilities of this promising energy conversion technology. However, systems utilizing diesel and jet fuel reforming are fairly complex and suffer from poor stability and limited dynamics. To address these challenges, this paper investigates the steady-state and transient operation of a 28 kWth fuel processor on the systems level. With the help of experiments that make use of the developed prototype, suitable operating parameters are sought to maximize the simultaneous fuel conversion in the reformer and CO conversion in the shift reactor. Furthermore, a load change strategy is developed with the aim of keeping the CO concentration at the fuel cell anode inlet below the target concentration of 1% of the wet product gas at all times. The identified parameters enable very high conversions (>99.95%) and CO concentrations even lower than the target during steady-state operation using three commercial fuels under full load. The developed load change strategy was validated during 90 min tests, including 16 load change cycles with loads between 40% and 100%. As well as providing excess steam during load change, the selection and control of optimal O2/C and H2O/C ratios and temperature levels proved to be of key importance. In order to minimize the CO concentration, it is recommended to operate the reformer at the identified parameters for each fuel and keep the shift outlet temperature between 295 and 300 °C by adjusting the water feed. The proposed fuel processor concept and the experimentally-validated operating strategies in this work can enable the successful implementation of fuel cell technology in different application areas, including auxiliary power units, remote power systems and range extenders.
536 _ _ |a 135 - Fuel Cells (POF3-135)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135
|c POF3-135
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Prawitz, Matthias
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129906
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Tschauder, Andreas
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129935
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Meissner, Jan
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129886
|b 3
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Pasel, Joachim
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129898
|b 4
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Peters, Ralf
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129902
|b 5
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115882
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2000772-3
|p 115882
|t Applied energy
|v 279
|y 2020
|x 0306-2619
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/875365/files/OAD0000069942.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/875365/files/1-s2.0-S0306261920313532-main.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:875365
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)207065
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129906
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129935
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129886
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129898
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129902
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Speicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-130
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Fuel Cells
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b APPL ENERG : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b APPL ENERG : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-14-20191129
|k IEK-14
|l Elektrochemische Verfahrenstechnik
|x 0
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-14-20191129
980 _ _ |a APC
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IET-4-20191129

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21