Gast ::
| Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Invasive versus non‐invasive mapping of the motor cortex > print |
| Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Invasive versus non‐invasive mapping of the motor cortex > print |
| 001 | 888641 | ||
| 005 | 20210130011047.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1002/hbm.25101 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1065-9471 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1097-0193 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/26448 |2 Handle |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:84814091 |2 altmetric |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:32588936 |2 pmid |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000543223500001 |2 WOS |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2020-05084 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a English |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Weiss Lucas, Carolin |0 0000-0001-6463-0034 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Invasive versus non‐invasive mapping of the motor cortex |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a New York, NY |c 2020 |b Wiley-Liss |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1607522205_13191 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a Precise and comprehensive mapping of somatotopic representations in the motor cortex is clinically essential to achieve maximum resection of brain tumours whilst preserving motor function, especially since the current gold standard, that is, intraoperative direct cortical stimulation (DCS), holds limitations linked to the intraoperative setting such as time constraints or anatomical restrictions. Non‐invasive techniques are increasingly relevant with regard to pre‐operative risk‐assessment. Here, we assessed the congruency of neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with DCS. The motor representations of the hand, the foot and the tongue regions of 36 patients with intracranial tumours were mapped pre‐operatively using nTMS and fMRI and by intraoperative DCS. Euclidean distances (ED) between hotspots/centres of gravity and (relative) overlaps of the maps were compared. We found significantly smaller EDs (11.4 ± 8.3 vs. 16.8 ± 7.0 mm) and better spatial overlaps (64 ± 38% vs. 37 ± 37%) between DCS and nTMS compared with DCS and fMRI. In contrast to DCS, fMRI and nTMS mappings were feasible for all regions and patients without complications. In summary, nTMS seems to be the more promising non‐invasive motor cortex mapping technique to approximate the gold standard DCS results. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572 |c POF3-572 |f POF III |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Nettekoven, Charlotte |0 P:(DE-Juel1)165785 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Neuschmelting, Volker |0 0000-0001-7527-6990 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Oros‐Peusquens, Ana‐Maria |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Stoffels, Gabriele |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131627 |b 4 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Viswanathan, Shivakumar |0 P:(DE-Juel1)162395 |b 5 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Rehme, Anne K. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)165784 |b 6 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Faymonville, Andrea Maria |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 7 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Shah, N. Jon |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131794 |b 8 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Langen, Karl Josef |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131777 |b 9 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Goldbrunner, Roland |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 10 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Grefkes, Christian |0 P:(DE-Juel1)161406 |b 11 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1002/hbm.25101 |g Vol. 41, no. 14, p. 3970 - 3983 |0 PERI:(DE-600)1492703-2 |n 14 |p 3970 - 3983 |t Human brain mapping |v 41 |y 2020 |x 1097-0193 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888641/files/Weiss_2020_HumBrainMapp_Invasive%20versus%20non-invasive%20mapping%20....pdf |y OpenAccess |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:888641 |p openaire |p open_access |p VDB |p driver |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a External Institute |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |k Extern |b 0 |6 0000-0001-6463-0034 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a External Institute |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |k Extern |b 2 |6 0000-0001-7527-6990 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 4 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131627 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 5 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)162395 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 8 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131794 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 9 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131777 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 11 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)161406 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |l Decoding the Human Brain |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500 |v (Dys-)function and Plasticity |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2020 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2020-08-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2020-08-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050 |2 StatID |b BIOSIS Previews |d 2020-08-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190 |2 StatID |b Biological Abstracts |d 2020-08-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |d 2020-08-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4 |2 HGFVOC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b HUM BRAIN MAPP : 2018 |d 2020-08-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DEAL Wiley |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3001 |2 StatID |d 2020-08-27 |w ger |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Life Sciences |d 2020-08-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2020-08-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2020-08-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |d 2020-08-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |d 2020-08-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2020-08-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320 |2 StatID |b PubMed Central |d 2020-08-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Nationallizenz |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420 |2 StatID |d 2020-08-27 |w ger |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2020-08-27 |
| 920 | _ | _ | |l yes |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 |k INM-3 |l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften |x 0 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406 |k INM-4 |l Physik der Medizinischen Bildgebung |x 1 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|