% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Ehosioke:888869,
author = {Ehosioke, Solomon and Nguyen, Frédéric and Rao,
Sathyanarayan and Kremer, Thomas and Placencia‐Gomez,
Edmundo and Huisman, Johan Alexander and Kemna, Andreas and
Javaux, Mathieu and Garre, Sarah},
title = {{S}ensing the electrical properties of roots: {A} review},
journal = {Vadose zone journal},
volume = {19},
number = {1},
issn = {1539-1663},
address = {Hoboken, NJ},
publisher = {Wiley},
reportid = {FZJ-2020-05279},
pages = {e20082},
year = {2020},
abstract = {Thorough knowledge of root system functioning is essential
to understand the feedback loops between plants, soil, and
climate. In situ characterization of root systems is
challenging due to the inaccessibility of roots and the
complexity of root zone processes. Electrical methods have
been proposed to overcome these difficulties. Electrical
conduction and polarization occur in and around roots, but
the mechanisms are not yet fully understood. We review the
potential and limitations of low‐frequency electrical
techniques for root zone investigation, discuss the
mechanisms behind electrical conduction and polarization in
the soil–root continuum, and address knowledge gaps. A
range of electrical methods for root investigation is
available. Reported methods using current injection in the
plant stem to assess the extension of the root system lack
robustness. Multi‐electrode measurements are increasingly
used to quantify root zone processes through soil moisture
changes. They often neglect the influence of root biomass on
the electrical signal, probably because it is yet to be well
understood. Recent research highlights the potential of
frequency‐dependent impedance measurements. These methods
target both surface and volumetric properties by activating
and quantifying polarization mechanisms occurring at the
root segment and cell scale at specific frequencies. The
spectroscopic approach opens up a range of applications.
Nevertheless, understanding electrical signatures at the
field scale requires significant understanding of
small‐scale polarization and conduction mechanisms.
Improved mechanistic soil–root electrical models,
validated with small‐scale electrical measurements on root
systems, are necessary to make further progress in ramping
up the precision and accuracy of multi‐electrode
tomographic techniques for root zone investigation.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000618773300075},
doi = {10.1002/vzj2.20082},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888869},
}