% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Lerche:891299,
author = {Lerche, Christoph W. and Radomski, Timon and Lohmann,
Philipp and Caldeira, Liliana and Brambilla, Claudia Regio
and Tellmann, Lutz and Scheins, Jurgen and Kops, Elena Rota
and Galldiks, Norbert and Langen, Karl-Josef and Herzog,
Hans and Shah, N. J.},
title = {{A} {L}inearized {F}it {M}odel for {R}obust {S}hape
{P}arameterization of {FET}-{PET} {TAC}s},
journal = {IEEE transactions on medical imaging},
volume = {40},
number = {7},
issn = {1558-254X},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {IEEE},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-01406},
pages = {1852 - 1862},
year = {2021},
abstract = {The kinetic analysis of 18F -FET time-activity curves (TAC)
can provide valuable diagnostic information in glioma
patients. The analysis is most often limited to the average
TAC over a large tissue volume and is normally assessed by
visual inspection or by evaluating the time-to-peak and
linear slope during the late uptake phase. Here, we derived
and validated a linearized model for TACs of 18F -FET in
dynamic PET scans. Emphasis was put on the robustness of the
numerical parameters and how reliably automatic voxel-wise
analysis of TAC kinetics was possible. The diagnostic
performance of the extracted shape parameters for the
discrimination between isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)
wildtype (wt) and IDH-mutant (mut) glioma was assessed by
receiver-operating characteristic in a group of 33 adult
glioma patients. A high agreement between the adjusted model
and measured TACs could be obtained and relative, estimated
parameter uncertainties were small. The best differentiation
between IDH-wt and IDH-mut gliomas was achieved with the
linearized model fitted to the averaged TAC values from
dynamic FET PET data in the time interval 4–50 min p.i..
When limiting the acquisition time to 20–40 min p.i.,
classification accuracy was only slightly lower $(-3\%)$ and
was comparable to classification based on linear fits in
this time interval. Voxel-wise fitting was possible within a
computation time ≈ 1 min per image slice. Parameter
uncertainties smaller than $80\%$ for all fits with the
linearized model were achieved. The agreement of best-fit
parameters when comparing voxel-wise fits and fits of
averaged TACs was very high (p < 0.001).},
cin = {INM-4 / INM-11 / INM-3 / JARA-BRAIN},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-11-20170113 /
I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)VDB1046},
pnm = {525 - Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
(POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {33735076},
UT = {WOS:000668842500010},
doi = {10.1109/TMI.2021.3067169},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/891299},
}