guest ::
| Home > Publications database > A Linearized Fit Model for Robust Shape Parameterization of FET-PET TACs |
| Home > Publications database > A Linearized Fit Model for Robust Shape Parameterization of FET-PET TACs |
| Journal Article | FZJ-2021-01406 |
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
2021
IEEE
New York, NY
This record in other databases: 
Please use a persistent id in citations: http://hdl.handle.net/2128/28161 doi:10.1109/TMI.2021.3067169
Abstract: The kinetic analysis of 18F -FET time-activity curves (TAC) can provide valuable diagnostic information in glioma patients. The analysis is most often limited to the average TAC over a large tissue volume and is normally assessed by visual inspection or by evaluating the time-to-peak and linear slope during the late uptake phase. Here, we derived and validated a linearized model for TACs of 18F -FET in dynamic PET scans. Emphasis was put on the robustness of the numerical parameters and how reliably automatic voxel-wise analysis of TAC kinetics was possible. The diagnostic performance of the extracted shape parameters for the discrimination between isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype (wt) and IDH-mutant (mut) glioma was assessed by receiver-operating characteristic in a group of 33 adult glioma patients. A high agreement between the adjusted model and measured TACs could be obtained and relative, estimated parameter uncertainties were small. The best differentiation between IDH-wt and IDH-mut gliomas was achieved with the linearized model fitted to the averaged TAC values from dynamic FET PET data in the time interval 4–50 min p.i.. When limiting the acquisition time to 20–40 min p.i., classification accuracy was only slightly lower (-3%) and was comparable to classification based on linear fits in this time interval. Voxel-wise fitting was possible within a computation time ≈ 1 min per image slice. Parameter uncertainties smaller than 80% for all fits with the linearized model were achieved. The agreement of best-fit parameters when comparing voxel-wise fits and fits of averaged TACs was very high (p < 0.001).
; 
; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Clinical Medicine ; Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology ; Ebsco Academic Search ; Essential Science Indicators ; IF >= 5 ; JCR ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection
|
The record appears in these collections: |
PDF
Fulltext by OpenAccess repository