Home > Workflow collections > Publication Charges > Greener production of dimethyl carbonate by the Power-to-Fuel concept: a comparative techno-economic analysis > print

001     891950
005     20241127124644.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1039/D0GC03865B
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1463-9262
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1463-9270
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/27673
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000629630600020
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2021-01846
082 _ _ |a 540
100 1 _ |a Huang, Hong
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)177000
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Greener production of dimethyl carbonate by the Power-to-Fuel concept: a comparative techno-economic analysis
260 _ _ |a Cambridge
|c 2021
|b RSC
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1619194972_2074
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Power-to-Fuel is an emerging concept that uses surplus electricity-powered H2 and CO2 to produce future fuels. Previously studied fuel candidates include methanol, Fischer–Tropsch, and ethers. Apart from these candidates, dimethyl carbonate (DMC) is increasingly recognized as a viable fuel. Various new production pathways are being actively developed encouraged by its wider range of applications. In this study, we first performed a preliminary screening of available pathways with respect to their levels of technical maturity and their compliance with green chemistry principles. The selected pathways are oxidative carbonylation of methanol, direct urea methanolysis as well as indirect urea methanolysis via ethylene carbonate and propylene carbonate routes. We designed the processes and simulated the material and energy balances in the context of the Power-to-Fuel concept. Subsequently, a techno-economic analysis was performed to assess their viability. From the analysis, we found that the process steps of methanol and urea syntheses are the major capital investment contributors, rather than the DMC synthesis step itself. The direct urea methanolysis exhibits the highest energy efficiency of 48.5% and the lowest cost of manufacturing (COM) of 2.19 € per lDE. The oxidative carbonylation of methanol is featured with the lowest capital expenditure (CAPEX) and utility consumption. Both the indirect urea methanolysis pathways have better conversions than the direct urea methanolysis, but their advantages can only be seen provided that the utility consumption is minimised. Under current market conditions, only the direct urea methanolysis pathway is slightly profitable by the net present value (NPV) and minimum selling price (MSP). The hydrogen price is found to be the dominant economic driver of all pathways, with the oxidative carbonylation of methanol in particular.
536 _ _ |a 135 - Fuel Cells (POF3-135)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135
|c POF3-135
|f POF III
|x 0
536 _ _ |a 134 - Electrolysis and Hydrogen (POF3-134)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134
|c POF3-134
|f POF III
|x 1
536 _ _ |a 1111 - Effective System Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1111
|c POF4-111
|f POF IV
|x 2
536 _ _ |a 1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112
|c POF4-111
|f POF IV
|x 3
536 _ _ |a 1232 - Power-based Fuels and Chemicals (POF4-123)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1232
|c POF4-123
|f POF IV
|x 4
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Samsun, Remzi Can
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)207065
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Peters, Ralf
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129902
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Stolten, Detlef
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129928
|b 3
773 _ _ |a 10.1039/D0GC03865B
|g Vol. 23, no. 4, p. 1734 - 1747
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2006274-6
|n 4
|p 1734 - 1747
|t Green chemistry
|v 23
|y 2021
|x 1463-9270
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/891950/files/d0gc03865b.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:891950
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)177000
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)207065
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129902
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129928
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129928
913 0 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Energie
|l Speicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-130
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Fuel Cells
|x 0
913 0 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Energie
|l Speicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-130
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Electrolysis and Hydrogen
|x 1
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Energiesystemdesign (ESD)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-111
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Energiesystemtransformation
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1111
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Energiesystemdesign (ESD)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-111
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Energiesystemtransformation
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112
|x 1
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Materialien und Technologien für die Energiewende (MTET)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-120
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-123
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Chemische Energieträger
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1232
|x 2
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1200
|2 StatID
|b Chemical Reactions
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b GREEN CHEM : 2019
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a Allianz-Lizenz / DFG
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0400
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-03
|w ger
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a National-Konsortium
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-03
|w ger
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b GREEN CHEM : 2019
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-03
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2021-02-03
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-14-20191129
|k IEK-14
|l Elektrochemische Verfahrenstechnik
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
|k IEK-3
|l Technoökonomische Systemanalyse
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-82)080011_20140620
|k JARA-ENERGY
|l JARA-ENERGY
|x 2
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-14-20191129
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-82)080011_20140620
980 _ _ |a APC
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IET-4-20191129
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-2-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IET-4-20191129

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21