% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Mishra:892348,
author = {Mishra, Tarini Prasad and Lenser, Christian and Raj, Rishi
and Guillon, Olivier and Bram, Martin},
title = {{D}evelopment of a processing map for safe flash sintering
of gadolinium‐doped ceria},
journal = {Journal of the American Ceramic Society},
volume = {104},
number = {9},
issn = {1551-2916},
address = {Westerville, Ohio},
publisher = {Soc.},
reportid = {FZJ-2021-02016},
pages = {4316-4328},
year = {2021},
abstract = {Flash sintering was discovered in 2010, where a dog- bone-
shaped zirconia sample was sintered at a furnace temperature
of 850°C in <5s by applying electric fields of
~100Vcm−1 directly to the specimen. Since its
discovery, it has been successfully ap-plied to several if
not all oxides and even ceramics of complex compositions.
Among several processing parameters in flash sintering, the
electrical parameters, i.e., electric field and electric
current, were found to influence the onset temperature for
flash and the degree of densification respectively. In this
work, we have systematically investi-gated the influence of
the electrical parameters on the onset temperature,
densification behavior, and microstructure of the flash
sintered samples. In particular, we focus on the development
of a processing map that delineates the safe and fail
regions for flash sintering over a wide range of applied
current densities and electric fields. As a proof of
concept, gadolinium- doped ceria (GDC) is shown as an
example for developing of such a processing map for flash
sintering, which can also be transferred to different
materials systems. Localization of current coupled with hot
spot formation and crack formation is identified as two
distinct failure modes in flash sintering. The grain size
distribution across the current localized and nominal
regions of the specimen was analyzed. The specimens show
exaggerated grain growth near the positive electrode
(anode). The region adjacent to the negative electrodes
(cathode) showed retarded densification with large
concentration of isolated pores. The electrical
conductiv-ity of the flash sintered and conventional
sintered samples shows identical electrical conductivity.
This quantitative analysis indicates that similar sintering
quality of the GDC can be achieved by flash sintering at
temperature as low as 680°C.},
cin = {IEK-1 / JARA-ENERGY},
ddc = {660},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-1-20101013 / $I:(DE-82)080011_20140620$},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899) / 123 - Chemische
Energieträger (POF4-123) / DFG project 274005202 - SPP
1959: Manipulation of matter controlled by electric and
magnetic fields: Towards novel synthesis and processing
routes of inorganic materials (274005202) / SOFC - Solid
Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC-20140602)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-123 /
G:(GEPRIS)274005202 / G:(DE-Juel1)SOFC-20140602},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000646668400001},
doi = {10.1111/jace.17847},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/892348},
}