% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@PHDTHESIS{Cerniauskas:906356,
author = {Cerniauskas, Simonas},
title = {{I}ntroduction {S}trategies for {H}ydrogen
{I}nfrastructure},
volume = {561},
school = {RWTH Aachen},
type = {Dissertation},
address = {Jülich},
publisher = {Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Zentralbibliothek, Verlag},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-01385},
isbn = {978-3-95806-602-1},
series = {Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich. Reihe Energie
$\&$ Umwelt / Energy $\&$ Environment},
pages = {viii, 186 S.},
year = {2021},
note = {RWTH Aachen, Diss., 2021},
abstract = {Efforts to alleviate climate change and curb greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions increasingly anticipate the widespread use
of hydrogen for transportation and industrial purposes.
Given the increased focus on hydrogen infrastructure
development, it is essential to devise measures capable of
assessing and mapping strategic choices to guide the further
development of the hydrogen market. The goal of this work is
to investigate what infrastructure and demand-side
strategies best facilitate hydrogen infrastructure
development for the transportation and industrial sectors in
Germany and thus enable the transition towards a
cost-optimized system in the long term. To achieve these
goals, a spatially-resolved model to represent relevant
features of a hydrogen infrastructure is developed and
populated with country-specific data on hydrogen demand
allocation and energy infrastructure. The approach
incorporates four different aspects of the transition to a
hydrogen-based system: transformation of the hydrogen
market, reconfiguration of hydrogen production and storage,
the evolution of a delivery infrastructure and the
changeover of refueling stations. It was found that gaseous
(GH2) and liquid (LH2) hydrogen trailers, as well as
utilization of the existing infrastructure, such as the use
of aging wind power plants and the reassignment of natural
gas pipelines, constitute the most attractive pathways for
the introduction of a hydrogen infrastructure. A high
concentration of supply is favored by LH2 delivery, whereas
GH2 pathways benefit from growing demand concentration in
industrial and population centers. Accordingly, GH2 pipeline
and trailer delivery should be the main focus of
infrastructure development, while LH2 transport is better
used as a supplementary alternative to optimize the
utilization of the existing LH2 infrastructure and seaborne
imports. It was shown that cost-competitive hydrogen
delivery for transportation could be attained by 2030, and
broad market adoption of hydrogen in transport is required
if cost-competitive hydrogen delivery for industry is to be
achieved.},
cin = {IEK-3},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013},
pnm = {1111 - Effective System Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)
/ 1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways
(POF4-111)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1111 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)3 / PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
urn = {urn:nbn:de:0001-2022040505},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/906356},
}