% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Ungermann:907363,
author = {Ungermann, Jörn and Kleinert, Anne and Maucher, Guido and
Bartolomé, Irene and Friedl-Vallon, Felix and Johansson,
Sören and Krasauskas, Lukas and Neubert, Tom},
title = {{Q}uantification and mitigation of the instrument effects
and uncertainties of the airborne limb imaging {FTIR}
{GLORIA}},
journal = {Atmospheric measurement techniques},
volume = {15},
number = {8},
issn = {1867-1381},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
publisher = {Copernicus},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-01993},
pages = {2503 - 2530},
year = {2022},
note = {This research has been supported by the Bundesministerium
für Bildung und Forschung (grant no. 01 LG 1907), the
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant no. SPP 1294), and
the European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research
(grant no. 16ENV03).I did not find these grants in the
list.},
abstract = {The Gimballed Limb Observer for Radiance Imaging of the
Atmosphere (GLORIA) is an infrared imaging FTS (Fourier
transform spectrometer) with a 2-D infrared detector that is
operated on two high-flying research aircraft. It has flown
on eight campaigns and measured along more than
300 000 km of flight track.This paper details our
instrument calibration and characterization efforts, which,
in particular, almost exclusively leverage in-flight data.
First, we present the framework of our new calibration
scheme, which uses information from all three available
calibration sources (two blackbodies and upward-pointing
“deep space” measurements). Part of this scheme is a new
algorithm for correcting the erratically changing
nonlinearity of a subset of detector pixels and the
identification of the remaining bad pixels.Using this new
calibration, we derive a 1σ bound of $1 \%$ on the
instrument gain error and a bound of
30 nW cm−2 sr−1 cm on the instrument offset
error. We show how we can examine the noise and spectral
accuracy for all measured atmospheric spectra and derive a
spectral accuracy of 5 ppm on average. All these errors
are compliant with the initial instrument requirements.We
also discuss, for the first time, the pointing system of the
GLORIA instrument. Combining laboratory calibration efforts
with the measurement of astronomical bodies during the
flight, we can achieve a pointing accuracy of 0.032∘,
which corresponds to one detector pixel.The paper concludes
with a brief study of how these newly characterized
instrument parameters affect temperature and ozone
retrievals. We find that the pointing uncertainty and, to a
lesser extent, the instrument gain uncertainty are the main
contributors to the error in the result.},
cin = {IEK-7 / ZEA-2},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013 / I:(DE-Juel1)ZEA-2-20090406},
pnm = {2112 - Climate Feedbacks (POF4-211) / 2A3 - Remote Sensing
(CARF - CCA) (POF4-2A3)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2112 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2A3},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000786551900001},
doi = {10.5194/amt-15-2503-2022},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/907363},
}