% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hensel:907508,
author = {Hensel, Lukas and Lange, Fabian and Tscherpel, Caroline and
Viswanathan, Shivakumar and Freytag, Jana and Eickhoff,
Simon and Volz, Lukas J. and Fink, Gereon Rudolf and
Grefkes, Christian},
title = {{R}ecovered grasping performance after stroke depends on
interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity},
journal = {Brain},
volume = {146},
number = {3},
issn = {0006-8950},
address = {Oxford},
publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-02063},
pages = {1006-1020},
year = {2023},
abstract = {Activity changes in the ipsi- and contralesional parietal
cortex and abnormal interhemispheric connectivity between
these regions are commonly observed after stroke, however,
their significance for motor recovery remains poorly
understood. We here assessed the contribution of
ipsilesional and contralesional anterior intraparietal
cortex (aIPS) for hand motor function in eighteen recovered
chronic stroke patients and eighteen healthy controls using
a multimodal assessment consisting of resting-state fMRI,
motor task fMRI, online-rTMS interference, and 3-D movement
kinematics. Effects were compared against two control
stimulation sites, i.e., contralesional M1 and a sham
stimulation condition. We found that patients with good
motor outcome compared to patients with more substantial
residual deficits featured increased resting-state
connectivity between ipsilesional aIPS and contralesional
aIPS as well as between ipsilesional aIPS and dorsal
premotor cortex. Moreover, interhemispheric connectivity
between ipsilesional M1 and contralesional M1 as well as
ipsilesional aIPS and contralesional M1 correlated with
better motor performance across tasks. TMS interference at
individual aIPS and M1 coordinates led to differential
effects depending on the motor task that was tested, i.e.,
index finger-tapping, rapid pointing movements, or a
reach-grasp-lift task. Interfering with contralesional aIPS
deteriorated the accuracy of grasping, especially in
patients featuring higher connectivity between ipsi- and
contralesional aIPS. In contrast, interference with the
contralesional M1 led to impaired grasping speed in patients
featuring higher connectivity between bilateral M1. These
findings suggest differential roles of contralesional M1 and
aIPS for distinct aspects of recovered hand motor function,
depending on the reorganization of interhemispheric
connectivity.},
cin = {INM-7 / INM-3},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
pnm = {5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525) / DFG
project 431549029 - SFB 1451: Schlüsselmechanismen normaler
und krankheitsbedingt gestörter motorischer Kontrolle
(431549029)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252 / G:(GEPRIS)431549029},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {35485480},
UT = {WOS:000894006500001},
doi = {10.1093/brain/awac157},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/907508},
}