% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Lu:909380,
author = {Lu, Xin and Tsai, Chih-Long and Yu, Shicheng and He,
Hongying and Camara, Osmane and Tempel, Hermann and Liu,
Zigeng and Windmüller, Anna and Alekseev, Evgeny and Basak,
Shibabrata and Lu, Li and Eichel, Rüdiger-A. and Kungl,
Hans},
title = {{L}ithium {P}hosphosulfide {E}lectrolytes for
{S}olid-{S}tate {B}atteries: {P}art {I}},
journal = {Functional materials letters},
volume = {15},
number = {5},
issn = {1793-6047},
address = {Singapore [u.a.]},
publisher = {World Scientific},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-03168},
pages = {2240001},
year = {2022},
abstract = {A high performance and stable Li-ion conductive solid
electrolyte is one of the key components for the future
all-solid-state batteries with metallic lithium anodes.
Phosphate, oxide and phosphosulfide-based inorganic solid
electrolytes are currently under development. High ambient
temperature Li-ion conductivities amounting up to 10−2 S
cm−1 for the best performing electrolytes distinguish the
phosphosulfides from the other material systems. Part I of
the review starts with the motivation and background for the
development of Li-phosphosulfide electrolytes followed by an
overview of four different types of phosphosulfide
electrolytes; the Li–P–S, thio-LiSICon, LGPS and the
Argyrodite-type electrolytes. The core of part I is
concerned with a detailed discussion of the phosphosulfide
electrolyte types that have been under investigation already
for a long time, the Li–P–S and the LiSICon. There is a
multiplicity of different compositions within each of these
types. The idea behind the outline of these sections is to
point out the relations and differences between the
different materials with respect to their chemistry related
to the phase diagrams. Patterns for the relations among the
materials identified in the phase diagrams are the base for
a discussion of structure, processing and Li-ion
conductivity within separate sections for each type and
resulting in intra-type comparisons. The follow up part II
will continue with a treatment of the more recently
developed LGPS and Argyrodite-type electrolytes tracking the
same concept, before addressing an inter-type comparison of
ambient temperature Li-ion conductivities and the
electrochemical stability of the electrolytes vs. metallic
lithium. A final section in part II summarizes conclusions
and provides perspectives for future research on Li-ion
conductive phosphosulfide electrolytes.},
cin = {IEK-9},
ddc = {540},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-9-20110218},
pnm = {1223 - Batteries in Application (POF4-122)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1223},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000848584400001},
doi = {10.1142/S179360472240001X},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/909380},
}