Home > Workflow collections > Publication Charges > Hemispheric asymmetries in recent changes in the stratospheric circulation > print

001     909803
005     20240712100847.0
024 7 _ |a 10.5194/acp-22-5559-2022
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1680-7316
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1680-7324
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/31871
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000787778000001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2022-03424
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Ploeger, Felix
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129141
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Hemispheric asymmetries in recent changes in the stratospheric circulation
260 _ _ |a Katlenburg-Lindau
|c 2022
|b EGU
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1669719818_21286
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The expected effect of ozone recovery on the stratospheric Brewer–Dobson circulation (BDC) is a slow-down, strongest in the Southern Hemisphere (SH). In contrast, the BDC has been found to weaken more strongly in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) relative to the SH in recent decades, inducing substantial effects on chemical composition. We investigate hemispheric asymmetries in BDC changes since about 2000 in simulations with the Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS) driven with different reanalyses (ERA5, ERA-Interim, JRA-55, MERRA-2) and contrast those to free-running climate model simulations. We find that age-of-air increases robustly in the NH stratosphere relative to the SH in all reanalyses. Related nitrous oxide changes agree well between reanalysis-driven simulations and satellite measurements, providing observational evidence for the hemispheric asymmetry in BDC changes. We show that the composition changes in reanalyses are caused by structural residual-circulation changes related to an upward shift and strengthening of the deep BDC branch, resulting in longer transit times, and a downward shift and weakening shallow branch in the NH relative to the SH. Although climate model simulations show that ozone recovery will lead to overall reduced circulation and age-of-air trends, the hemispherically asymmetric signal in circulation trends is small compared to internal variability. Therefore, observed circulation trends over the recent past are not in contradiction to expectations from climate models. Furthermore, the hemispheric asymmetry in BDC trends imprints on the composition of the lower stratosphere, and the signal might propagate into the troposphere, potentially affecting composition down to the surface.
536 _ _ |a 2112 - Climate Feedbacks (POF4-211)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2112
|c POF4-211
|x 0
|f POF IV
536 _ _ |a 2B3 - ESM (CTA - CCA) (POF4-2B3)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2B3
|c POF4-2B3
|x 1
|f POF IV
536 _ _ |a DFG project 428312742 - TRR 301: Die Tropopausenregion in einer Atmosphäre im Wandel
|0 G:(GEPRIS)428312742
|c 428312742
|x 2
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Garny, Hella
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)192281
|b 1
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.5194/acp-22-5559-2022
|g Vol. 22, no. 8, p. 5559 - 5576
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2069847-1
|n 8
|p 5559 - 5576
|t Atmospheric chemistry and physics
|v 22
|y 2022
|x 1680-7316
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/909803/files/acp-22-5559-2022.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:909803
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129141
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)192281
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-211
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Die Atmosphäre im globalen Wandel
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2112
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l CROSS-TOPIC ACTIVITIES (CTAs)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2B0
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2B3
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v ESM (CTA - CCA)
|x 1
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-02-02
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-02-02
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-02
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2019-12-18T05:37:09Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2019-12-18T05:37:09Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Peer review
|d 2019-12-18T05:37:09Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2022-11-19
915 p c |a APC keys set
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
915 p c |a Local Funding
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001
915 p c |a DFG OA Publikationskosten
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0002
915 p c |a DOAJ Journal
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0003
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
|k IEK-7
|l Stratosphäre
|x 0
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
980 _ _ |a APC
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-4-20101013

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21