001     910372
005     20221026130455.0
024 7 _ |a 2128/32112
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2022-03783
100 1 _ |a Li, Jingwei
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)164828
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
111 2 _ |a INM & IBI Retreat 2022 "Molecular neuroscience meets brain function"
|c Jülich
|d 2022-10-18 - 2022-10-19
|w Germany
245 _ _ |a Cross-ethnicity/race generalization failure of RSFC-based behavioral prediction and potential consequences
260 _ _ |c 2022
336 7 _ |a Conference Paper
|0 33
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a INPROCEEDINGS
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a conferenceObject
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a CONFERENCE_POSTER
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Conference Poster
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Poster
|b poster
|m poster
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)24
|s 1666697818_31446
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|x Other
520 _ _ |a Machine learning (ML) plays an important role in precision medicine. However, algorithmic biases that favor majority populations pose a key challenge to ML applications (Chouldechova 2018; Martin 2019; Obermeyer 2019). In neuroimaging, there is growing interest in the prediction of behavioral phenotypes based on resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC; Finn 2015, 2021; Greene 2018). But prediction biases/unfairness in this context were not assessed in the literature. Especially, predictive models were typically built by capitalizing on large cohorts with mixed ethnic group, in which the proportions of certain ethnical groups, e.g. African Americans (AA), are limited. Whether the models perform equally well across different ethnic groups was unclear. By using two large-scale neuroimaging datasets from the United States, we compared the prediction accuracy between AA and white Americans (WA) when ML models were trained on different composition of ethnic groups. We observed larger prediction errors in AA than WA for most behavioral measures, which was only limitedly affected by the composition of training population. We also investigated potential downstream consequences of biased predictions of behavioral phenotypes if they were used uncritically.
536 _ _ |a 5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
700 1 _ |a Bzdok, Danilo
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Tam, Angela
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Ooi, Leon Qi Rong
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Holmes, Avram
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Ge, Tian
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Patil, Kaustubh
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)172843
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Jabbi, Mbemba
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Eickhoff, Simon
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Yeo, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
700 1 _ |a GENON, Sarah
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)161225
|b 10
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/910372/files/INM%20IBI%20Retreat%2068_Jingwei.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:910372
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)164828
910 1 _ |a HHU Düsseldorf
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)164828
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)172843
910 1 _ |a HHU Düsseldorf
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)172843
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
910 1 _ |a HHU Düsseldorf
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 10
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)161225
910 1 _ |a HHU Düsseldorf
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 10
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)161225
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a poster
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21