001     910588
005     20230123110710.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1038/s42003-022-03196-0
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/32313
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a 35365757
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000777178500001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2022-03966
082 _ _ |a 570
100 1 _ |a Deng, Shikuang
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Control theory illustrates the energy efficiency in the dynamic reconfiguration of functional connectivity
260 _ _ |a London
|c 2022
|b Springer Nature
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1667463779_9517
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The brain's functional connectivity fluctuates over time instead of remaining steady in a stationary mode even during the resting state. This fluctuation establishes the dynamical functional connectivity that transitions in a non-random order between multiple modes. Yet it remains unexplored how the transition facilitates the entire brain network as a dynamical system and what utility this mechanism for dynamic reconfiguration can bring over the widely used graph theoretical measurements. To address these questions, we propose to conduct an energetic analysis of functional brain networks using resting-state fMRI and behavioral measurements from the Human Connectome Project. Through comparing the state transition energy under distinct adjacent matrices, we justify that dynamic functional connectivity leads to 60% less energy cost to support the resting state dynamics than static connectivity when driving the transition through default mode network. Moreover, we demonstrate that combining graph theoretical measurements and our energy-based control measurements as the feature vector can provide complementary prediction power for the behavioral scores (Combination vs. Control: t = 9.41, p = 1.64e-13; Combination vs. Graph: t = 4.92, p = 3.81e-6). Our approach integrates statistical inference and dynamical system inspection towards understanding brain networks.
536 _ _ |a 5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Li, Jingwei
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)164828
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Thomas Yeo, B. T.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Gu, Shi
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1038/s42003-022-03196-0
|g Vol. 5, no. 1, p. 295
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2919698-X
|n 1
|p 295
|t Communications biology
|v 5
|y 2022
|x 2399-3642
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/910588/files/s42003-022-03196-0.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:910588
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)164828
910 1 _ |a HHU Düsseldorf
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)164828
910 1 _ |a School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-06-15
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2021-06-15
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-06-15
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2021-06-15
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2021-06-15
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b COMMUN BIOL : 2021
|d 2022-11-12
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-12
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-12
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2021-10-13T14:52:02Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-10-13T14:52:02Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Blind peer review
|d 2021-10-13T14:52:02Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2022-11-12
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2022-11-12
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-12
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-12
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2022-11-12
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2022-11-12
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040
|2 StatID
|b Zoological Record
|d 2022-11-12
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b COMMUN BIOL : 2021
|d 2022-11-12
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21