% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Syranidou:910939,
      author       = {Syranidou, Chloi and Koch, Matthias and Matthes, Björn and
                      Winger, Christian and Linßen, Jochen and Rehtanz, Christian
                      and Stolten, Detlef},
      title        = {{D}evelopment of an open framework for a qualitative and
                      quantitative comparison of power system and electricity grid
                      models for {E}urope},
      journal      = {Renewable $\&$ sustainable energy reviews},
      volume       = {159},
      issn         = {1364-0321},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-04268},
      pages        = {112055 -},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {The ongoing needs to develop power systems towards more
                      environmentally friendly technologies with respect to
                      climate change in conjunction with the continuous evolution
                      of the respective market conditions is leading to a
                      transition away from the traditional system operation. The
                      upcoming challenges have motivated the development of an
                      increasing number of models for transmission grids.
                      Nevertheless, the high complexity of such models renders it
                      exceedingly difficult to compare their results as well as
                      any corresponding conclusions.In this paper, we develop an
                      open framework to compare a variety of pan-European
                      transmission grid models with a strong focus on the German
                      power system. The comparison is performed in both a
                      qualitative and quantitative manner, depending on the
                      investigated modeling aspect including input data, methods,
                      system boundaries and results. The quantitative model
                      comparison is done by performing harmonized model
                      experiments, one for 2016 as back testing and one for 2030
                      for analyzing the future system.Core elements of our
                      comparison framework are:We proved that our comparison
                      framework is suitable to make similarities and differences
                      between the different model results visible, e.g. using
                      quadratic heat maps. To ensure transparency and to support
                      the open modeling community, the fact sheets with the model
                      specifications and the database with selected model results
                      are uploaded on the open energy platform.},
      cin          = {IEK-3},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013},
      pnm          = {1111 - Effective System Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)
                      / 1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways
                      (POF4-111)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1111 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000786647400001},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.rser.2021.112055},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/910939},
}