% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Galldiks:912547,
      author       = {Galldiks, Norbert and Lohmann, Philipp},
      title        = {{I}maging patterns in patients with newly diagnosed
                      glioblastoma in {E}ngland},
      journal      = {Neuro-oncology practice},
      volume       = {9},
      number       = {6},
      issn         = {2054-2577},
      address      = {Oxford},
      publisher    = {Oxford Univ. Press},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-05720},
      pages        = {461 - 462},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {The study by Dumba and colleagues1 explored the incidence
                      and timing of various peridiagnostic neuroimaging techniques
                      such as MRI, CT, and PET in patients with newly diagnosed
                      glioblastoma using a national database. Particularly,
                      preoperative, early postoperative, and pre-radiotherapy
                      imaging patterns for all glioblastoma patients aged 15–99
                      years resident in England in the years 2013 and 2014 were
                      retrospectively evaluated.The entire cohort for data
                      analysis comprised 4,307 patients. The main finding of the
                      study is that prediagnostic imaging appears uniform, whereas
                      postdiagnostic imaging practice varied considerably. Of
                      note, the authors observed that there is clear evidence for
                      low use of early postoperative MRI, the low use of
                      additional MR imaging before radiotherapy, and the very
                      limited use of other neuroimaging techniques such as
                      advanced MRI and PET. For example, in the group of patients
                      who underwent surgery and chemoradiation, only $51\%$ had an
                      early postoperative MRI within 72 hours after surgery. In
                      patients undergoing surgery who subsequently received
                      radiotherapy, only $61\%$ had both an early postoperative
                      and a pre-radiotherapy MRI. To improve the diagnostic
                      performance, only $7\%$ of the cohort underwent one or more
                      of the advanced MRI options (ie, perfusion-weighted MRI,
                      proton MR spectroscopy), and less than $1\%$ of the cohort
                      had additional PET imaging with various tracers (eg,
                      radiolabeled amino acids, [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose)
                      during the course of the disease.},
      cin          = {INM-3 / INM-4},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406},
      pnm          = {5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {36388412},
      UT           = {WOS:000885427200002},
      doi          = {10.1093/nop/npac059},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/912547},
}