Journal Article FZJ-2020-02469

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
2.5D crosshole GPR full-waveform inversion with synthetic and measured data

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2020
GeoScienceWorld Alexandria, Va.

Geophysics 85(4), H71 - H82 () [10.1190/geo2019-0600.1]

This record in other databases:    

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: Full-waveform inversion (FWI) of cross-borehole ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data is a technique with the potential to investigate subsurface structures. Typical FWI applications transform 3D measurements into a 2D domain via an asymptotic 3D to 2D data transformation, widely known as a Bleistein filter. Despite the broad use of such a transformation, it requires some assumptions that make it prone to errors. Although the existence of the errors is known, previous studies have failed to quantify the inaccuracies introduced on permittivity and electrical conductivity estimation. Based on a comparison of 3D and 2D modeling, errors could reach up to 30% of the original amplitudes in layered structures with high-contrast zones. These inaccuracies can significantly affect the performance of crosshole GPR FWI in estimating permittivity and especially electrical conductivity. We have addressed these potential inaccuracies by introducing a novel 2.5D crosshole GPR FWI that uses a 3D finite-difference time-domain forward solver (gprMax3D). This allows us to model GPR data in 3D, whereas carrying out FWI in the 2D plane. Synthetic results showed that 2.5D crosshole GPR FWI outperformed 2D FWI by achieving higher resolution and lower average errors for permittivity and conductivity models. The average model errors in the whole domain were reduced by approximately 2% for permittivity and conductivity, whereas zone-specific errors in high-contrast layers were reduced by approximately 20%. We verified our approach using crosshole 2.5D FWI measured data, and the results showed good agreement with previous 2D FWI results and geologic studies. Moreover, we analyzed various approaches and found an adequate trade-off between computational complexity and accuracy of the results, i.e., reducing the computational effort while maintaining the superior performance of our 2.5D FWI scheme.

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Agrosphäre (IBG-3)
Research Program(s):
  1. 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255) (POF3-255)

Appears in the scientific report 2020
Database coverage:
Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences ; Essential Science Indicators ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Dokumenttypen > Aufsätze > Zeitschriftenaufsätze
Institutssammlungen > IBG > IBG-3
Workflowsammlungen > Öffentliche Einträge
Workflowsammlungen > Publikationsgebühren
Publikationsdatenbank

 Datensatz erzeugt am 2020-07-03, letzte Änderung am 2022-09-30