% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{WeissLucas:888641,
      author       = {Weiss Lucas, Carolin and Nettekoven, Charlotte and
                      Neuschmelting, Volker and Oros‐Peusquens, Ana‐Maria and
                      Stoffels, Gabriele and Viswanathan, Shivakumar and Rehme,
                      Anne K. and Faymonville, Andrea Maria and Shah, N. Jon and
                      Langen, Karl Josef and Goldbrunner, Roland and Grefkes,
                      Christian},
      title        = {{I}nvasive versus non‐invasive mapping of the motor
                      cortex},
      journal      = {Human brain mapping},
      volume       = {41},
      number       = {14},
      issn         = {1097-0193},
      address      = {New York, NY},
      publisher    = {Wiley-Liss},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-05084},
      pages        = {3970 - 3983},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Precise and comprehensive mapping of somatotopic
                      representations in the motor cortex is clinically essential
                      to achieve maximum resection of brain tumours whilst
                      preserving motor function, especially since the current gold
                      standard, that is, intraoperative direct cortical
                      stimulation (DCS), holds limitations linked to the
                      intraoperative setting such as time constraints or
                      anatomical restrictions. Non‐invasive techniques are
                      increasingly relevant with regard to pre‐operative
                      risk‐assessment. Here, we assessed the congruency of
                      neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) and
                      functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with DCS. The
                      motor representations of the hand, the foot and the tongue
                      regions of 36 patients with intracranial tumours were mapped
                      pre‐operatively using nTMS and fMRI and by intraoperative
                      DCS. Euclidean distances (ED) between hotspots/centres of
                      gravity and (relative) overlaps of the maps were compared.
                      We found significantly smaller EDs (11.4 ± 8.3 vs. 16.8
                      ± 7.0 mm) and better spatial overlaps $(64 ± 38\%$
                      vs. $37 ± 37\%)$ between DCS and nTMS compared with DCS
                      and fMRI. In contrast to DCS, fMRI and nTMS mappings were
                      feasible for all regions and patients without complications.
                      In summary, nTMS seems to be the more promising
                      non‐invasive motor cortex mapping technique to approximate
                      the gold standard DCS results.},
      cin          = {INM-3 / INM-4},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:32588936},
      UT           = {WOS:000543223500001},
      doi          = {10.1002/hbm.25101},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888641},
}