guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Bayesian calibration, process modeling and uncertainty quantification in biotechnology |
| Home > Publications database > Bayesian calibration, process modeling and uncertainty quantification in biotechnology |
| Preprint | FZJ-2021-03378 |
; ; ; ;
2021
This record in other databases:
Please use a persistent id in citations: http://hdl.handle.net/2128/28597 doi:10.1101/2021.06.30.450546
Abstract: High-throughput experimentation has revolutionized data-driven experimental sciences and opened the door to the application of machine learning techniques. Nevertheless, the quality of any data analysis strongly depends on the quality of the data and specifically the degree to which random effects in the experimental data-generating process are quantified and accounted for. Accordingly calibration, i.e. the quantitative association between observed quantities with measurement responses, is a core element of many workflows in experimental sciences. Particularly in life sciences, univariate calibration, often involving non-linear saturation effects, must be performed to extract quantitative information from measured data. At the same time, the estimation of uncertainty is inseparably connected to quantitative experimentation. Adequate calibration models that describe not only the input/output relationship in a measurement system, but also its inherent measurement noise are required. Due to its mathematical nature, statistically robust calibration modeling remains a challenge for many practitioners, at the same time being extremely beneficial for machine learning applications. In this work, we present a bottom-up conceptual and computational approach that solves many problems of understanding and implementing non-linear, empirical calibration modeling for quantification of analytes and process modeling. The methodology is first applied to the optical measurement of biomass concentrations in a high-throughput cultivation system, then to the quantification of glucose by an automated enzymatic assay. We implemented the conceptual framework in two Python packages, with which we demonstrate how it makes uncertainty quantification for various calibration tasks more accessible. Our software packages enable more reproducible and automatable data analysis routines compared to commonly observed workflows in life sciences. Subsequently, we combine the previously established calibration models with a hierarchical Monod-like differential equation model of microbial growth to describe multiple replicates of Corynebacterium glutamicum batch microbioreactor cultures. Key process model parameters are learned by both maximum likelihood estimation and Bayesian inference, highlighting the flexibility of the statistical and computational framework.
; 
|
The record appears in these collections: |
PDF
Fulltext by OpenAccess repository