Journal Article FZJ-2025-02151

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
From hydraulic root architecture models to efficient macroscopic sink terms including perirhizal resistance: quantifying accuracy and computational speed

 ;  ;

2025
EGU Munich

Hydrology and earth system sciences 29(6), 1759 - 1782 () [10.5194/hess-29-1759-2025]

This record in other databases:  

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:  doi:

Abstract: Root water uptake strongly affects soil water balance and plant development. It can be described by mechanistic models of soil–root hydraulics based on soil water content, soil and root hydraulic properties, and the dynamic development of the root architecture. Recently, novel upscaling methods have emerged, which enable the application of detailed mechanistic models on a larger scale, particularly for land surface and crop models, by using mathematical upscaling.In this study, we explore the underlying assumptions and the mathematical fundamentals of different upscaling approaches. Our analysis rigorously investigates the errors introduced in each step during the transition from fine-scale mechanistic models, which considers the nonlinear perirhizal resistance around each root, to more macroscopic representations. Upscaling steps simplify the representation of the root architecture, the perirhizal geometry, and the soil spatial dimension and thus introduces errors compared to the full complex 3D simulations. In order to investigate the extent of these errors, we perform simulation case studies, spring barley as a representative non-row crop and maize as a representative row crop, using three different soils.We show that the error introduced by the upscaling steps strongly differs, depending on root architecture and soil type. Furthermore, we identify the individual steps and assumptions that lead to the most important losses in accuracy. An analysis of the trade-off between model complexity and accuracy provides valuable guidance for selecting the most suitable approach for specific applications.

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Agrosphäre (IBG-3)
Research Program(s):
  1. 2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217) (POF4-217)

Appears in the scientific report 2025
Database coverage:
Medline ; Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 ; DOAJ ; OpenAccess ; Article Processing Charges ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences ; DOAJ Seal ; Essential Science Indicators ; Fees ; IF >= 5 ; JCR ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Dokumenttypen > Aufsätze > Zeitschriftenaufsätze
Institutssammlungen > IBG > IBG-3
Workflowsammlungen > Öffentliche Einträge
Workflowsammlungen > Publikationsgebühren
Publikationsdatenbank
Open Access

 Datensatz erzeugt am 2025-04-01, letzte Änderung am 2025-04-14


Dieses Dokument bewerten:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Bisher nicht rezensiert)