Journal Article/Contribution to a conference proceedings FZJ-2025-05677

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Survey on the use of tenability criteria in CFD analyses for Performance-Based Fire Safety Engineering

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2025
IOP Publ. Bristol

5th European Symposium on Fire Safety Science, LjubljanaLjubljana, Slovenia, 3 Sep 2025 - 5 Sep 20252025-09-032025-09-05 Journal of physics / Conference Series 3121(1), 012045 - () [10.1088/1742-6596/3121/1/012045]

This record in other databases:  

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:  doi:

Abstract: An online survey on the use of tenability criteria in CFD analyses for PBFSE was conducted, to better understand the current industry practices in fire modelling. 254 participants responded, representing wide range of roles in professional practice. Visibility in smoke is the most used (90.2%) and most influential (91.4%) tenability criterion, while smoke temperatures are being commonly evaluated (76.5%) but more rarely impact the design (45.8%). Criteria related to smoke toxicity were used only by 10.4% - 19.9% of participants, indicating potential gaps in life safety assessments. The paper presents more detailed results, as well as future research directions informed by the outcomes.

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Zivile Sicherheitsforschung (IAS-7)
Research Program(s):
  1. 5111 - Domain-Specific Simulation & Data Life Cycle Labs (SDLs) and Research Groups (POF4-511) (POF4-511)

Appears in the scientific report 2025
Database coverage:
Medline ; Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 ; OpenAccess ; NationallizenzNationallizenz ; SCOPUS
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Events > Contributions to a conference proceedings
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > IAS > IAS-7
Workflow collections > Public records
Online First

 Record created 2025-12-19, last modified 2025-12-19


OpenAccess:
Download fulltext PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)