Journal Article FZJ-2026-05009

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Bridging the Energy Balance Gap in Eddy‐Covariance Measurements: Insights From Standardized Network Data

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2026
Wiley-Blackwell Oxford [u.a.]

Global change biology 32(5), e70892 () [10.1111/gcb.70892]

This record in other databases:  

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:  doi:

Abstract: The lack of energy balance closure in Eddy- Covariance (EC) measurements is a well-known, still unresolved challenge in mi-crometeorology, with energy balance closure (EBC) rates typically ranging between 60% and 80%. While numerous hypotheseshave been proposed to explain this imbalance, the relative contributions of neglected energy storage terms, data quality and fluxprocessing options remain insufficiently disentangled. Using standardized ICOS and NEON datasets, we show that a significantportion of the observed energy imbalance can be attributed to overlooked or inconsistently handled energy components and tur-bulent flux quality control. Using data drawn from 84 sites, we show that comprehensive energy accounting—including soil heatflux, storage terms (soil, air, biomass), photosynthetic energy demand, and strict quality filtering of turbulent fluxes—improvedEBC by 16% on average, with site-specific gains up to 40%. However, we also identify a persistent residual imbalance that is un-likely to be resolved through methodological refinements or additional measurements alone, pointing to fundamental physicalprocesses that are not accounted for in the standard measurement and processing. We argue that this unresolved imbalanceshould be explicitly acknowledged and bounded, rather than implicitly absorbed into correction schemes, and we outline prac-tical guidance for diagnosing and interpreting EBC in standardized flux networks. This perspective evaluates methodologicaladvances and residual uncertainties, providing an actionable framework for the appropriate use of EC energy fluxes in carbon,water, and climate research.

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Agrosphäre (IBG-3)
Research Program(s):
  1. 2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217) (POF4-217)

Appears in the scientific report 2026
Database coverage:
Medline ; Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 ; OpenAccess ; BIOSIS Previews ; Biological Abstracts ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences ; DEAL Wiley ; Ebsco Academic Search ; Essential Science Indicators ; IF >= 10 ; JCR ; NationallizenzNationallizenz ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection ; Zoological Record
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Dokumenttypen > Aufsätze > Zeitschriftenaufsätze
Institutssammlungen > IBG > IBG-3
Workflowsammlungen > Öffentliche Einträge
Publikationsdatenbank
Open Access

 Datensatz erzeugt am 2026-10-13, letzte Änderung am 2026-10-13


OpenAccess:
Volltext herunterladen PDF
Dieses Dokument bewerten:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Bisher nicht rezensiert)