Journal Article

FZJ-2017-02348

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png Against Strong Ethical Parity: Situated Cognition Theses and Transcranial Brain Stimulation

Heinrichs, J.-H. (Corresponding author)FZJ*

2017
Frontiers Research Foundation Lausanne

This record in other databases:      

Please use a persistent id in citations: http://hdl.handle.net/2128/14198  doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00171

Abstract: According to a prominent suggestion in the ethics of transcranial neurostimulation the effects of such devices can be treated as ethically on par with established, pre-neurotechnological alterations of the mind. This parity allegedly is supported by situated cognition theories showing how external devices can be part of a cognitive system. This article will evaluate this suggestion. It will reject the claim, that situated cognition theories support ethical parity. It will however point out another reason, why external carriers or modifications of the mental might come to be considered ethically on par with internal carriers. Section “Why Could There Be Ethical Parity between Neural Tissue and External Tools?” presents the ethical parity theses between external and internal carriers of the mind as well as neurotechnological alterations and established alterations. Section “Extended, Embodied, Embedded: Situated Cognition as a Relational Thesis” will elaborate the different situated cognition approaches and their relevance for ethics. It will evaluate, whether transcranial stimulation technologies are plausible candidates for situated cognition theses. Section “On the Ethical Relevance of Situated Cognition Theses” will discuss criteria for evaluating whether a cognitive tool is deeply embedded with a cognitive system and apply these criteria to transcranial brain stimulation technologies. Finally it will discuss the role diverse versions of situated cognition theory can play in the ethics of altering mental states, especially the ethics of transcranial brain stimulation technologies.

---

Contributing Institute(s):

1. Ethik in den Neurowissenschaften (INM-8)

Research Program(s):

1. 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572) (POF3-572)
2. 574 - Theory, modelling and simulation (POF3-574) (POF3-574)

Appears in the scientific report 2017

---

Database coverage:
; ; ; ; BIOSIS Previews ; DOAJ Seal ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; NCBI Molecular Biology Database ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Thomson Reuters Master Journal List ; Web of Science Core Collection

---