Journal Article

FZJ-2018-02008

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png Problems associated to kinetic fitting of incubation data

Weihermüller, L. (Corresponding author)FZJ* ; Neuser, A. ; Herbst, M.FZJ* ; Vereecken, H.FZJ*

2018
Elsevier Science Amsterdam [u.a.]

This record in other databases:    

Please use a persistent id in citations: http://hdl.handle.net/2128/18654  doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.017

Abstract: Incubation is a classical laboratory experiment to gain information about the carbon turnover from soils under different treatments (e.g., temperatures, water content, nutrient supply), amendments (e.g. biochar, straw, compost), or from different locations (e.g. topsoil vs. subsoil). Classically, the measured data are represented as cumulated CO2 flux or as % total organic carbon (TOC) mineralized and from those data kinetic parameters are often derived using models of different complexity. Based on the conceptual idea that more than one C-pool exists, especially in soil mixtures, the simple single-pool model is more and more substituted by double-pool models to describe these data. Hereby, the model will be iteratively fitted to the data to obtain the pool sizes and rate constants of the pools (slow and fast). In the work presented, we show that the fitting of double-pool models will lead to different results in the pool sizes and kinetic parameters, depending on the fitting approach used. Secondly, general problems of over-fitting and the ill-posed problem are discussed, whereby it will be shown, that especially the estimation of the rate constant for the slow pool is highly uncertain. Based on these general findings and problems in the fitting procedure, fitting results reported in literature were analyzed. The meta-analysis indicates that only a small number of reported fits are apparently not well fitted, whereas a non-negligible percentage of reported fits were over-fitted or wrong parameters were reported. Finally, the paper provides guidelines for kinetic fitting and discusses possible fitting alternatives.

---

Contributing Institute(s):

1. Agrosphäre (IBG-3)

Research Program(s):

1. 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255) (POF3-255)

Appears in the scientific report 2018

---

Database coverage:
; ; BIOSIS Previews ; Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; NCBI Molecular Biology Database ; Nationallizenz ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Thomson Reuters Master Journal List ; Web of Science Core Collection ; Zoological Record

---