Journal Article FZJ-2020-01807

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Call for Participation: Collaborative Benchmarking of Functional-Structural Root Architecture Models. The Case of Root Water Uptake

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2020
Frontiers Media88991 Lausanne

Frontiers in Functional Plant Ecology 11, 316 () [10.3389/fpls.2020.00316]

This record in other databases:      

Please use a persistent id in citations:   doi:

Abstract: Three-dimensional models of root growth, architecture and function are becoming important tools that aid the design of agricultural management schemes and the selection of beneficial root traits. However, while benchmarking is common in many disciplines that use numerical models, such as natural and engineering sciences, functional-structural root architecture models have never been systematically compared. The following reasons might induce disagreement between the simulation results of different models: different representation of root growth, sink term of root water and solute uptake and representation of the rhizosphere. Presently, the extent of discrepancies is unknown, and a framework for quantitatively comparing functional-structural root architecture models is required. We propose, in a first step, to define benchmarking scenarios that test individual components of complex models: root architecture, water flow in soil and water flow in roots. While the latter two will focus mainly on comparing numerical aspects, the root architectural models have to be compared at a conceptual level as they generally differ in process representation. Therefore, defining common inputs that allow recreating reference root systems in all models will be a key challenge. In a second step, benchmarking scenarios for the coupled problems are defined. We expect that the results of step 1 will enable us to better interpret differences found in step 2. This benchmarking will result in a better understanding of the different models and contribute toward improving them. Improved models will allow us to simulate various scenarios with greater confidence and avoid bugs, numerical errors or conceptual misunderstandings. This work will set a standard for future model development.

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Agrosphäre (IBG-3)
  2. Pflanzenwissenschaften (IBG-2)
Research Program(s):
  1. 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255) (POF3-255)
  2. 582 - Plant Science (POF3-582) (POF3-582)

Appears in the scientific report 2020
Database coverage:
Medline ; Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 ; OpenAccess ; NCBI Molecular Biology Database
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Dokumenttypen > Aufsätze > Zeitschriftenaufsätze
Institutssammlungen > IBG > IBG-3
Institutssammlungen > IBG > IBG-2
Workflowsammlungen > Öffentliche Einträge
Workflowsammlungen > Publikationsgebühren
Publikationsdatenbank
Open Access

 Datensatz erzeugt am 2020-04-24, letzte Änderung am 2022-09-30