Journal Article FZJ-2020-02908

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
DEMO physics challenges beyond ITER

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2020
Elsevier New York, NY [u.a.]

Fusion engineering and design 156, 111603 - () [10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111603]

This record in other databases:    

Please use a persistent id in citations:   doi:

Abstract: For electricity producing tokamak fusion reactors like EU-DEMO, it is prudent to choose a plasma scenario close to the ITER baseline, where the largest amount of experimental evidence is available. Nevertheless, there are some aspects in which ITER and EU-DEMO have to differ, as the simple exercise of up-scaling from ITER to a larger device is constrained both by physical nonlinearities and by technological limits. In this work, relevant differences between ITER and the current EU-DEMO baseline in terms of plasma scenario are discussed. Firstly, EU-DEMO is assumed to operate with a very large amount of radiative power originating both from the scrape-off layer and, markedly, from the core. This radiation level is obtained by means of seeded impurities, whose presence significantly affects many aspects of the scenario itself, especially in terms of transient control. Secondly, because of the need of breeding tritium, the EU-DEMO wall is less robust than the ITER one. This implies that every off-normal interruption of the plasma discharge, for example in presence of a divertor reattachment, cannot rely on fast-shutdown procedures finally triggering a loss of plasma control at high current, but other strategies need to be developed. Thirdly, the ITER method for the control of the so-called sawteeth (ST) has been shown to be too expensive in terms of auxiliary power requirements, thus other solutions have to be explored. Finally, the problem of actively mitigating, or suppressing, the Edge Localised Modes (ELMs) has recently increased the interest on naturally ELM-free regimes (like QH-mode, I-mode, and also negative triangularity) for EU-DEMO, thus increasing the needs for ELM mitigation or suppression with respect to the approach adopted in ITER.

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Plasmaphysik (IEK-4)
Research Program(s):
  1. 174 - Plasma-Wall-Interaction (POF3-174) (POF3-174)

Appears in the scientific report 2020
Database coverage:
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 ; Embargoed OpenAccess ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology ; Ebsco Academic Search ; Essential Science Indicators ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; NationallizenzNationallizenz ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > IFN > IFN-1
Workflow collections > Public records
IEK > IEK-4
Publications database
Open Access

 Record created 2020-08-24, last modified 2024-07-08


Published on 2020-03-05. Available in OpenAccess from 2022-03-05.:
Download fulltext PDF Download fulltext PDF (PDFA)
External link:
Download fulltextFulltext by OpenAccess repository
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)