Journal Article FZJ-2021-00197

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Brain Responses to Noxious Stimuli in Patients With Chronic Pain

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2021
American Medical Association Chicago, Ill.

JAMA network open 4(1), e2032236 () [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32236]

This record in other databases:      

Please use a persistent id in citations:   doi:

Abstract: Importance Functional neuroimaging is a valuable tool for understanding how patients with chronic pain respond to painful stimuli. However, past studies have reported heterogenous results, highlighting opportunities for a quantitative meta-analysis to integrate existing data and delineate consistent associations across studies.Objective To identify differential brain responses to noxious stimuli in patients with chronic pain using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while adhering to current best practices for neuroimaging meta-analyses.Data Sources All fMRI experiments published from January 1, 1990, to May 28, 2019, were identified in a literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS.Study Selection Experiments comparing brain responses to noxious stimuli in fMRI between patients and controls were selected if they reported whole-brain results, included at least 10 patients and 10 healthy control participants, and used adequate statistical thresholding (voxel-height P < .001 or cluster-corrected P < .05). Two independent reviewers evaluated titles and abstracts returned by the search. In total, 3682 abstracts were screened, and 1129 full-text articles were evaluated.Data Extraction and Synthesis Thirty-seven experiments from 29 articles met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Coordinates reporting significant activation differences between patients with chronic pain and healthy controls were extracted. These data were meta-analyzed using activation likelihood estimation. Data were analyzed from December 2019 to February 2020.Main Outcomes and Measures A whole-brain meta-analysis evaluated whether reported differences in brain activation in response to noxious stimuli between patients and healthy controls were spatially convergent. Follow-up analyses examined the directionality of any differences. Finally, an exploratory (nonpreregistered) region-of-interest analysis examined differences within the pain network.Results The 37 experiments from 29 unique articles included a total of 511 patients and 433 controls (944 participants). Whole-brain meta-analyses did not reveal significant differences between patients and controls in brain responses to noxious stimuli at the preregistered statistical threshold. However, exploratory analyses restricted to the pain network revealed aberrant activity in patients.Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review and meta-analysis, preregistered, whole-brain analyses did not reveal aberrant fMRI activity in patients with chronic pain. Exploratory analyses suggested that subtle, spatially diffuse differences may exist within the pain network. Future work on chronic pain biomarkers may benefit from focus on this core set of pain-responsive areas.

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Gehirn & Verhalten (INM-7)
  2. Strukturelle und funktionelle Organisation des Gehirns (INM-1)
Research Program(s):
  1. 525 - Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction (POF4-525) (POF4-525)

Appears in the scientific report 2021
Database coverage:
Medline ; Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 ; DOAJ ; OpenAccess ; Article Processing Charges ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Clinical Medicine ; DOAJ Seal ; Essential Science Indicators ; Fees ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > INM > INM-7
Institute Collections > INM > INM-1
Workflow collections > Public records
Publications database
Open Access

 Record created 2021-01-12, last modified 2021-06-23


OpenAccess:
Download fulltext PDF
External link:
Download fulltextFulltext by OpenAccess repository
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)