Journal Article

FZJ-2022-01468

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png Decision Models and Technology Can Help Psychiatry Develop Biomarkers

Barron, D. S. (Corresponding author) ; Baker, J. T. ; Budde, K. S. ; Bzdok, D. ; Eickhoff, S. B.FZJ* ; Friston, K. J. ; Fox, P. T. ; Geha, P. ; Heisig, S. ; Holmes, A. ; Onnela, J.-P. ; Powers, A. ; Silbersweig, D. ; Krystal, J. H.

2021
Frontiers Research Foundation Lausanne

This record in other databases:      

Please use a persistent id in citations: http://hdl.handle.net/2128/30821  doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.706655

Abstract: Why is psychiatry unable to define clinically useful biomarkers? We explore this question from the vantage of data and decision science and consider biomarkers as a form of phenotypic data that resolves a well-defined clinical decision. We introduce a framework that systematizes different forms of phenotypic data and further introduce the concept of decision model to describe the strategies a clinician uses to seek out, combine, and act on clinical data. Though many medical specialties rely on quantitative clinical data and operationalized decision models, we observe that, in psychiatry, clinical data are gathered and used in idiosyncratic decision models that exist solely in the clinician's mind and therefore are outside empirical evaluation. This, we argue, is a fundamental reason why psychiatry is unable to define clinically useful biomarkers: because psychiatry does not currently quantify clinical data, decision models cannot be operationalized and, in the absence of an operationalized decision model, it is impossible to define how a biomarker might be of use. Here, psychiatry might benefit from digital technologies that have recently emerged specifically to quantify clinically relevant facets of human behavior. We propose that digital tools might help psychiatry in two ways: first, by quantifying data already present in the standard clinical interaction and by allowing decision models to be operationalized and evaluated; second, by testing whether new forms of data might have value within an operationalized decision model. We reference successes from other medical specialties to illustrate how quantitative data and operationalized decision models improve patient care.

---

Contributing Institute(s):

1. Gehirn & Verhalten (INM-7)

Research Program(s):

1. 5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525) (POF4-525)

Appears in the scientific report 2022

---

Database coverage:
; ; ; ; Article Processing Charges ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Clinical Medicine ; Current Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences ; DOAJ Seal ; Essential Science Indicators ; Fees ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; PubMed Central ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Social Sciences Citation Index ; Web of Science Core Collection

---