Journal Article PreJuSER-14820

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Moral concepts set decision strategies to abstract values

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2011
PLoS Lawrence, Kan.

PLoS one 6, e18451 () [10.1371/journal.pone.0018451]

This record in other databases:      

Please use a persistent id in citations:   doi:

Abstract: Persons have different value preferences. Neuroimaging studies where value-based decisions in actual conflict situations were investigated suggest an important role of prefrontal and cingulate brain regions. General preferences, however, reflect a superordinate moral concept independent of actual situations as proposed in psychological and socioeconomic research. Here, the specific brain response would be influenced by abstract value systems and moral concepts. The neurobiological mechanisms underlying such responses are largely unknown. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with a forced-choice paradigm on word pairs representing abstract values, we show that the brain handles such decisions depending on the person's superordinate moral concept. Persons with a predominant collectivistic (altruistic) value system applied a "balancing and weighing" strategy, recruiting brain regions of rostral inferior and intraparietal, and midcingulate and frontal cortex. Conversely, subjects with mainly individualistic (egocentric) value preferences applied a "fight-and-flight" strategy by recruiting the left amygdala. Finally, if subjects experience a value conflict when rejecting an alternative congruent to their own predominant value preference, comparable brain regions are activated as found in actual moral dilemma situations, i.e., midcingulate and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Our results demonstrate that superordinate moral concepts influence the strategy and the neural mechanisms in decision processes, independent of actual situations, showing that decisions are based on general neural principles. These findings provide a novel perspective to future sociological and economic research as well as to the analysis of social relations by focusing on abstract value systems as triggers of specific brain responses.

Keyword(s): Adult (MeSH) ; Behavior: ethics (MeSH) ; Behavior: physiology (MeSH) ; Brain: physiology (MeSH) ; Decision Making: ethics (MeSH) ; Decision Making: physiology (MeSH) ; Female (MeSH) ; Humans (MeSH) ; Intelligence: physiology (MeSH) ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MeSH) ; Male (MeSH) ; Morals (MeSH) ; Personality: physiology (MeSH) ; Social Values (MeSH) ; J

Classification:

Note: This work was supported by the Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association within the Helmholtz Alliance on Systems Biology (Human Brain Model; KZ), the Helmholtz Alliance for Mental Health in an Aging Society (HelMA; KZ, KA), and a grant of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research ('Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung', BMBF; No: 01GW0613; KA). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Molekulare Organisation des Gehirns (INM-2)
  2. Strukturelle und funktionelle Organisation des Gehirns (INM-1)
Research Program(s):
  1. Funktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems (FUEK409) (FUEK409)
  2. 89571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF2-89571) (POF2-89571)

Appears in the scientific report 2011
Database coverage:
Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 ; OpenAccess
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > INM > INM-2
Institute Collections > INM > INM-1
Workflow collections > Public records
Publications database
Open Access

 Record created 2012-11-13, last modified 2021-01-29