TypAmountVATCurrencyShareStatusCost centre
Hybrid-OA2952.000.00EUR100.00 %(Zahlung erfolgt)DB001648
Sum2952.000.00EUR   
Total2952.00     
Journal Article FZJ-2022-01983

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Comparison of different methods of spatial disaggregation of electricity generation and consumption time series

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2022
Elsevier Science Amsterdam [u.a.]

Renewable & sustainable energy reviews 163, 112186 - () [10.1016/j.rser.2022.112186]

This record in other databases:  

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: Energy system models involve various input data sets representing the generation, consumption and transport infrastructure of electricity. Especially energy system models with a focus on the transmission grid require time series of electricity feed-in and consumption in a high spatial resolution. In general, there are two approaches to obtain regionalized time series: top-down and bottom-up. In many cases, both methodologies may be combined to aggregate or disaggregate input data. Furthermore, there exist various approaches to assign regionalized feed-in of renewable energy sources and electrical load to the model’s grid connection points. The variety in the regionalization process leads to significant differences on a regional scope, even if global values are the same.We develop a Methodology to compare regionalization techniques of input data for photovoltaics, wind and electrical load between various models as well as data assignment techniques to the power grid nodes. We further define two invariants to evaluate the outcome of the regionalization process at the NUTS 3 level, one invariant for the annual profiles and one for the installed capacities. This Methodology enabled us to compare different regionalization and assignment workflows using simple parameters, without explicit knowledge of grid topology. Our results show that the resolution of the input data and the use of a top-down or a bottom-up approach are the most determinant factors in the regionalization process.

Classification:

Note: 04.09.2026 Liebe Frau Lexis, dieser Artikel gehört nicht zum IEK-3 bzw. ICE-2. Keiner der Autoren stammt(e) von unserem Institut. Bitte noch die PoF-Zahl 1111 löschen. Danke. VG, Anke Clemens

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Technoökonomische Systemanalyse (IEK-3)
Research Program(s):
  1. 1111 - Effective System Transformation Pathways (POF4-111) (POF4-111)

Database coverage:
Medline ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology ; Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology ; Ebsco Academic Search ; Ebsco Academic Search ; Essential Science Indicators ; Essential Science Indicators ; IF >= 10 ; IF >= 15 ; JCR ; JCR ; NationallizenzNationallizenz ; NationallizenzNationallizenz ; SCOPUS ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Institute Collections > ICE > ICE-2
Workflow collections > Relevant for Publication database
Workflow collections > User submitted records
Workflow collections > Publication Charges
IEK > IEK-3

 Record created 2022-04-25, last modified 2026-09-04


Restricted:
Download fulltext PDF
(additional files)
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)